Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 18:36:56 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <3d74bde656131ddb2a431901b3a0aeeb71649e70@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq6g9l$1ptg9$2@dont-email.me>
 <vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me> <vq751g$1t7oc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq78ni$1u8bl$3@dont-email.me>
 <5e786c32c2dcc88be50183203781dcb6a5d8d046@i2pn2.org>
 <vq866t$23nt0$1@dont-email.me>
 <2002d599ebdfb7cd5a023881ab2faca9801b219d@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8l3d$29b9l$1@dont-email.me>
 <4426787ad065bfd0939e10b937f3b8b2798d0578@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me>
 <920b573567d204a5c792425b09097d79ee098fa5@i2pn2.org>
 <vq9lvn$2ei4j$3@dont-email.me>
 <4453bc0c1141c540852ea2223a7fedefc93f564c@i2pn2.org>
 <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me> <vqae74$2ivcn$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 23:36:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3031561"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vqae74$2ivcn$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 5247
Lines: 80

On 3/5/25 4:03 PM, dbush wrote:
> On 3/5/2025 3:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 3/5/2025 10:14 AM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Wed, 05 Mar 2025 08:10:00 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 3/5/2025 6:19 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 3/5/25 12:09 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach the 'ret' 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the direct execution and some world-class simulators 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> no problem to reach it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> DD calls its own emulator when emulated by HHH.
>>>>>>>>>>>> DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when emulated by HHH1. DD 
>>>>>>>>>>>> DOES
>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT call its own emulator when directly executed.
>>>>>>>>>>> Which just show your stupidity, as DD doesn't HAVE its own
>>>>>>>>>>> emulator, and CAN'T know who or if it is being emulated.
>>>>>>>>>> It is not my stupidity it is your dishonestly using the straw-man
>>>>>>>>>> deception to change the subject away from:
>>>>>>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>>>>>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>>>>>>> WHich is the strawman, that you are too stupid to recogines.
>>>>>>>> I will show that it is not straw-man after you quit dodging that
>>>>>>>> point.
>>>>>>> Wrong order,
>>>>>> I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY OTHER ORDER
>>>>> In other words, you CAN'T handle any other order, even though 
>>>>> logically
>>>>> requried, because you need to hide your fraud.
>>>> My proof requires a specific  prerequisite order.
>>>> One cannot learn algebra before one has learned to count to ten.
>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>> Is the first step of the mandatory prerequisite order of my proof
>>> What is the next step?
>>>
>>
>> *DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach*
>> *its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally*
>>
>> It has taken two years to create this first step such that it
>> is the the simplest way to state the key element of the
>> whole proof and make this element impossible to correctly refute.
>>
>> EVERY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM THIS POINT
>> IS DISHONEST.
>>
> 
> Before agreeing on an answer, it is first required to agree on the 
> question.

Which is the problem, since you don't have the correct question.

If HHH is a Halt Decider / Termination analyzer, the ONLY behavior that 
matters is the behavior of the directly executed program whose 
description is provided.

Your problem is that isn't what you claim you HHH is doing, and thus you 
aren't asking the right question, but trying to pass off your POOP as a 
halt decider.

THen you have the problem that neitehr your HHH or your DD are actually 
programs, so you are just building on a bigger set of lies.

The fact that you ignore these points, and continue to try to go back to 
your proven wrong ideas, just shows that you are nothing but a ignorant 
fraud that is so stupid you can't understand how stupid you are and how 
transparent your lies are.

Sorry, that is the facts, and how you have sealed the doom of your memory,