Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: do you believe we can quantize =?UTF-8?B?Z3Jhdml0eT8=?=
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:18:29 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <3eeda91637960d56227668bb451ce488@www.novabbs.com>
References: <j9oiptyjxgxi$.dlg@tomato.potato> <sbirtk-56q42.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <eaf2af09821e0f3c4e780f09cfb742fd@www.novabbs.com> <02cff57f49c5b9f6ef0d33441951cb1e@www.novabbs.com> <lqsstk-85j62.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <678b32e2a0eba553fdcf24b9489cc5d5@www.novabbs.com> <aflttk-b2682.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <06a143affa77a528480f8fb55f650787@www.novabbs.com> <o0gvtk-5gba2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <171469a06dcc0b480244123ef80cb6c7@www.novabbs.com> <76c0uk-4rvb2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2062025"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$JKVbkELiZWGCfKUNMkCoSeh4l4MOVfTt7kis8CfttA9f/Ivx56Q8a
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 4119
Lines: 79

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:40:09 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:39:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:00:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> <snip old crap>
>>>
>>>>> Having watched your videos I have to ask, what is it that you think is
>>>>> new in YOUR railgun in one sentence? Where is your math that shows it is
>>>>> anything new?
>>>>
>>>> Heavy armature, very low voltage, very light weight.
>>>
>>> Nothing new there whatsoever.
>>
>> Keep on lying.
>>>
>>>> It is a new design
>>>> rail gun which proved Arindam's thesis that it has no reaction by easily
>>>> reproducible experiment. Which is the greatest science discovery of our
>>>> time.
>>>
>>> Yet you have no details, no instrumentation, no data and no analysis
>>> with error bars that prove anything.  Just crackpot ravings.
>>
>> Keep on lying. What better to expect from racist bigots!
>
> Does your railgun have two parallel conductors connected to a DC power
> source?
>
> Yes, nothing new there.
>
> Does your railgun have a conductive armateur across the rails?
>
> Yes, nothing new there.
>
> Do you have any measurements that show your railgun does not follow the
> same equations of all other railguns since 1917?
>
> No, nothing new there.
>
> Size, weight, and power supply size are irrelevant as railguns have been
> built using paper clips and a joule or so of energy to megajoule guns.

Different designs, fool. Not one of them could provide enough momentum
for inertia violation the way Arindam's new design does.
>
> You have no data, no analysis, no math and nothing new, crackpot.

Lies. They are all given in detail online. Anyone can follow the links.
>
> In one sentence, what is new about your railgun, crackpot?

Proved reaction less.

 Thus completing Arindam's PhD thesis at RMIT Melbourne not that he
wants anything from them any more.

 Enough satisfaction to have proved them and the physics world wrong.

Anyway to give the P* its due that one now does say that Arindam did
indeed make a working model of a railgun. This goes against what the
final viva committee at RMIT thought which thought was repeated in this
newsgroup by whodat, Moroney, Alsing, etc. The viva committee said that
Arindam did NOT make a working model of a railgun so his thesis that it
was performing reactionlessly (thus violating Newtonian laws) was to be
dismissed.

Some small advance here, thus - despite the kicking and screaming of the
racist bigots pursuing age-old suppression tactics.

What fools these apes be!

Woof-woof

Bertietaylor