Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <3f1fedcdd2dd5821307450056e3b1afe@www.novabbs.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<3f1fedcdd2dd5821307450056e3b1afe@www.novabbs.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 80286 protected mode
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:14:25 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <3f1fedcdd2dd5821307450056e3b1afe@www.novabbs.org>
References: <2024Oct6.150415@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <memo.20241006163428.19028W@jgd.cix.co.uk> <2024Oct7.093314@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <7c8e5c75ce0f1e7c95ec3ae4bdbc9249@www.novabbs.org> <2024Oct8.092821@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <ve5ek3$2jamt$1@dont-email.me> <2024Oct13.174537@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vejbts$1772o$2@dont-email.me> <3e885f3c9d768541e2b07180d5821a1f@www.novabbs.org> <20241014222042.00004247@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2072278"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="o5SwNDfMfYu6Mv4wwLiW6e/jbA93UAdzFodw5PEa6eU";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cb29269328a20fe5719ed6a1c397e21f651bda71
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$GAyaFoFEy26CxwIOrASoaeJdriqopOV41SIsR7Hm8XhpRgZnV99/a
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2059
Lines: 20

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 19:20:42 +0000, Michael S wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 19:02:51 +0000
> mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:04:28 +0000, David Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 13/10/2024 17:45, Anton Ertl wrote:
>>
>>> I do think it would be convenient if there were a fully standard
>>> way to compare independent pointers (other than just for equality).
>>>  Rarely needing something does not mean /never/ needing it.
>>
>> OK, take a segmented memory model with 16-bit pointers and a 24-bit
>> virtual address space. How do you actually compare to segmented
>> pointers ??
>
> That's their problem. The rest of the C world shouldn't suffer because
> of odd birds.

So, you are saying that 286 in its hey-day was/is odd ?!?