Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<3fddf5a7bc291abaf2bc49d856d87fcb@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 23:08:46 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <3fddf5a7bc291abaf2bc49d856d87fcb@www.novabbs.com>
References: <dad338831baa98f3eb1ca50452fd9401@www.novabbs.com> <be051db4136835108537c9497c5dfab8@www.novabbs.com> <e766d5b3f2f87f9604f0937ad65a4284@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2580967"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="hWiuCAeR3KEZYJfTvV11n0qrRi6oqW/zjvEZQQGun9A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$ynn7rJSNQwauISR.n6JKR.JJwfe3//G0NPmyeHXN3J7XdOU3y/NuK
X-Rslight-Posting-User: f685b96694175b2ad43ead343ead0a9c0082fe88
Bytes: 4904
Lines: 95

To Paul and Lawrence: I´ll try to explain ONE MORE TIME why the H-K
experiment was a massive FRAUD.

PART 1: Data from the two flights (multiple segments):

FINAL RESULTS, AS PUBLISHED IN 1972 IN SCIENCE MAGAZINE (values are in
nanoseconds)

1.1 Starting 4 October 1971, eastward flights lasted 65 hours, with 41
accumulated hours of flight.

Predicted for GR (eastward flight): +144  ± 14
Predicted for SR (eastward flight): -184  ± 18
THEORETICAL TOTAL EASTWARD FLIGHT: -40  ± 23
MEASURED TOTAL EASTWARD FLIGHT: -59  ± 10


1.2 Starting 13 October 1971, westward flights lasted 80.3 hours, with
48.6 accumulated hours of flight.
Predicted for GR (westward flight): +179  ± 18
Predicted for SR (westward flight): +96  ± 10
THEORETICAL TOTAL WESTWARD FLIGHT: +275 ± 21
MEASURED TOTAL WESTWARD FLIGHT: +273 ± 7


2. INSTRUMENTS USED FOR THE EXPERIMENT

- 6 HP 5060 A (laboratory model, not the portable HP 5061 A)

   - 2 HP 5060 A for the eastward flights (several segments, with many
take-off, landing and delays).
   - 2 different HP 5060 A Cs atomic clocks for the westward flights.
   - 2 different HP 5060 A Cs atomic clocks (reference), located in
Washington D.C.)

- 2 HP 5360A Time Measurement instruments, one used by H-K in their
flights, and the other used in
  the Naval Observatory Lab (Washington D.C.).

  The main objective of these two HP 5360 A was TO MEASURE THE SHORT
DIFFERENCES IN TIME from each of
  the THREE PAIRS of HP 5060 A, by taking (and storing, written at hand,
more than 5,000 single shot
  measurements. This data was used TO STATISTICALLY CALIBRATE (to cook)
differences of time on each
  pair of atomic clocks (4 used in the planes, and two in Washington
D.C.).

3. WHERE IS THE MAIN HOAX OF THE EXPERIMENT?

Have VERY PRESENT that the two pairs of traveling clocks HAD NO
MECHANISMS INVOLVED for real time
comparison with the pair of reference clocks in Washington D.C.

The above paragraph IS CRUCIAL TO UNDERSTAND WHY THE EXPERIMENT WAS AN
HOAX, being the perpetrators FREE TO ACCOMMODATE THE RECOLLECTED DATA
ONLY WHEN THE EXPERIMENT FINISHED, and the SIX CLOCKS were
sent to the Naval Observatory (145.3 hours PLUS 1 week between east and
west flights. Total: 313 hours).

Then, and ONLY THEN, with the six atomic clocks side by side in the lab,
A COMPARISON OF TIME DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE REFERENCE PAIR AND EACH SET
OF TRAVELING CLOCKS COULD BE PERFORMED (at will).

I REMARK THIS: There was NO WAY to know (in real time) the differences
in time between the flying clocks and the reference clocks. OTHERWISE,
they would (proudly) have been presented the EVOLUTION of the
differences as time and distance accumulated during the 313 hours that
the experiment lasted.

To that time, add many more hours for the lab setup, in order to measure
each traveling clock with the reference clocks.

What they obtained was a HUGE AMOUNT OF DATA (5,000+ onboard
measurements, plus an equivalent amount for the clocks in the lab),
which HAD TO BE PROCESSED in order to present it (as a summary) ONE YEAR
AFTER.

To obtain the "MEASUREMENTS" for each flight (east, west), THEORETICAL
ASSERTIONS had to be used to
separate the "measured data", and split it INTO TWO SEPARATE FICTITIOUS
MEASUREMENTS, which never existed.

The above is based on the CRUEL REALITY BEHIND THE EXPERIMENT, which is
that NO REAL TIME COMMUNICATION EXISTED BETWEEN THE SIX CLOCKS. Only ONE
VALUE, OBTAINED AFTER THE EXPERIMENT WAS DONE.


If any of you, relativists, can't understand the above explanations, I
strongly suggest that you find another hobby that do not require BLIND
FAITH IN WHAT IS PUBLISHED. Plus, a new IQ test could help you to
understand the capabilities of your minds a little more.

THINK!!

DON'T JUST BELIEVE. THINK!!