Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers
 are wrong
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 17:07:23 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <3fecc81b7b9b661ef0ec148aec56b5a796a946e8@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq1qnr$q7t4$3@dont-email.me>
	<f0be934f2a26969e435b81050738f0960d4eb366@i2pn2.org>
	<vq1uqs$r6p7$2@dont-email.me>
	<e7868f47c94b8edcc6fcf2b224e8ac5ea8a2fa7c@i2pn2.org>
	<vq2246$r6p7$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 17:07:23 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2480367"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2623
Lines: 33

Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 10:48:06 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 3/2/2025 10:22 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 09:51:56 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 3/2/2025 8:55 AM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 08:42:03 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>
>>>>> I challenged everyone here to provide the machine address by machine
>>>>> address (AKA line by line) execution trace of DD correctly emulated
>>>>> by HHH that reaches its own "ret" instruction.
>>>>> No one made any attempt to do this because they know that this would
>>>>> prove that they are stupidly wrong to say that my trace is
>>>>> incorrect.
>>>> I did, on thursday at 9pm UTC.
>>> I am asking for a sequence of 10 hexadecimal integer machine addresses
>>> of DD correctly emulated by HHH.
>> See that post.
> Do you not know what a hexadecimal integer machine address is?
Are you a compiler?

> On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote:
>  > Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH, because it doesn't call DD in turn,
> Is counterfactual The actual HHH does emulate itself emulating DD as a
> 100% totally verified fact.
Calling != simulating. And you only wanted the instructions of DD. 

>  > we continue with 2141 until the conditional jump, whereupon we either
>  > enter an infinite loop (which is more than 15 instructions) or
>  > proceed to return (which is 13 instructions), depending on the return
>  > value of HHH.
There you go. 

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.