Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<3ff2defde254df16c2755d8cf08b77f4@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: How can gravity itself escape a black =?UTF-8?B?aG9sZT8=?=
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 12:31:33 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <3ff2defde254df16c2755d8cf08b77f4@www.novabbs.com>
References: <0c2d15b56c8574a409160470daacd2aa@www.novabbs.com> <67245699.7E0@ix.netcom.com> <69b218714bad6ce079ec190277a8f310@www.novabbs.com> <0d3a4391-7167-b0a4-c1d6-b0d4ec74fc08@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <97dfb8e00846bea7e0b4b2b75bb47330@www.novabbs.com> <1803dbfe8d933bdb$48683$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <36ad461db86e3be2e5f718b8acfd57ce@www.novabbs.com> <1803eef29fa0d3de$57533$990713$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <392be6fbe6f7c218e56283abede5aef8@www.novabbs.com> <180415cdbcf7f47c$439028$963880$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="593648"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Viu1tU59M/oMxEfWpQmLa.W2RWB3Pu4XIAT6hiIiJ1ONwXCjGbvpO
Bytes: 4009
Lines: 72

On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 7:22:13 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 02.11.2024 o 02:06, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 19:30:09 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > And still I've provided more than 40 examples
> > > of times that for sure didn't exist before
> > > humans invented them.
> >
> > And still that's irrelevant
>
> Sure, 40 examples of grey elephants are irrelevant
> when an idiot simply KNOWS elephants are purple.

Yep, Wozniak still knows his marijuana.

> > Those who earn Nobel prizes are NOT idiots.
>
> Often. Usually.

So would Wozniak care to identify a Nobel idiot?

> > See?  Wozniak goes for personal attack, every time.
>
> Sadly, talking to scumbags like you and
> your fellows I have to descend to
> your level; but that's only partially,
> I'm not descending to slandering.

“Denial is the worst kind of lie … because it is the lie
you tell yourself.” – Michelle A. Homme

Wozniak has nothing to harm.  Any "reputation" he may have
once had has been frittered away by his own behavior.  He
himself has lied, libeled and written despicably for years.
No one believes anything he says.  Complaining about being
"slandered" again and again just proves that he is a wuss
and a hypocrite.

> > > And?  Is the mass frozen for such
> > > observer or not? No answer? Sure.
> > > Slandering is easy, answerring
> > > questions is not, right, poor trash?
> >
> > :-))  There he is, looking really, really stupid again.  And
> > slandering again, too!  If he doesn't understand the difference
> > between linear and circular motion,
>
> Yes, I do.

So what is the difference?  Wozniak is silent.  Obviously, he
doesn't know.

> So, s the mass frozen for such
> observer or not? No answer? Sure.
> Slandering is easy, answerring
> questions is not, right, poor trash?

There he is again, still looking really, really stupid.  And
"slandering" again, too!  He just cuts and pastes the same old
foolish assertions, demands, lies and insults without even
fixing the typos.

Well, he probably knows something about circular motion because
he goes around and around and around without getting anywhere.
Perhaps this explains why he always acts like he's dizzy.

The fact is, he himself can't be slandered or libeled because
Wozniak has no` to harm.  Any "reputation" he may have once had
has frittered away by his own behavior.  He himself has lied,
libeled and written despicable nonsense for years, to the point
where no one believes anything he says.