| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<3ff2defde254df16c2755d8cf08b77f4@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: How can gravity itself escape a black =?UTF-8?B?aG9sZT8=?= Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 12:31:33 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <3ff2defde254df16c2755d8cf08b77f4@www.novabbs.com> References: <0c2d15b56c8574a409160470daacd2aa@www.novabbs.com> <67245699.7E0@ix.netcom.com> <69b218714bad6ce079ec190277a8f310@www.novabbs.com> <0d3a4391-7167-b0a4-c1d6-b0d4ec74fc08@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <97dfb8e00846bea7e0b4b2b75bb47330@www.novabbs.com> <1803dbfe8d933bdb$48683$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <36ad461db86e3be2e5f718b8acfd57ce@www.novabbs.com> <1803eef29fa0d3de$57533$990713$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <392be6fbe6f7c218e56283abede5aef8@www.novabbs.com> <180415cdbcf7f47c$439028$963880$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="593648"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Viu1tU59M/oMxEfWpQmLa.W2RWB3Pu4XIAT6hiIiJ1ONwXCjGbvpO Bytes: 4009 Lines: 72 On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 7:22:13 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 02.11.2024 o 02:06, gharnagel pisze: > > > > On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 19:30:09 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > > > And still I've provided more than 40 examples > > > of times that for sure didn't exist before > > > humans invented them. > > > > And still that's irrelevant > > Sure, 40 examples of grey elephants are irrelevant > when an idiot simply KNOWS elephants are purple. Yep, Wozniak still knows his marijuana. > > Those who earn Nobel prizes are NOT idiots. > > Often. Usually. So would Wozniak care to identify a Nobel idiot? > > See? Wozniak goes for personal attack, every time. > > Sadly, talking to scumbags like you and > your fellows I have to descend to > your level; but that's only partially, > I'm not descending to slandering. “Denial is the worst kind of lie … because it is the lie you tell yourself.” – Michelle A. Homme Wozniak has nothing to harm. Any "reputation" he may have once had has been frittered away by his own behavior. He himself has lied, libeled and written despicably for years. No one believes anything he says. Complaining about being "slandered" again and again just proves that he is a wuss and a hypocrite. > > > And? Is the mass frozen for such > > > observer or not? No answer? Sure. > > > Slandering is easy, answerring > > > questions is not, right, poor trash? > > > > :-)) There he is, looking really, really stupid again. And > > slandering again, too! If he doesn't understand the difference > > between linear and circular motion, > > Yes, I do. So what is the difference? Wozniak is silent. Obviously, he doesn't know. > So, s the mass frozen for such > observer or not? No answer? Sure. > Slandering is easy, answerring > questions is not, right, poor trash? There he is again, still looking really, really stupid. And "slandering" again, too! He just cuts and pastes the same old foolish assertions, demands, lies and insults without even fixing the typos. Well, he probably knows something about circular motion because he goes around and around and around without getting anywhere. Perhaps this explains why he always acts like he's dizzy. The fact is, he himself can't be slandered or libeled because Wozniak has no` to harm. Any "reputation" he may have once had has frittered away by his own behavior. He himself has lied, libeled and written despicable nonsense for years, to the point where no one believes anything he says.