Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <4-GlI_h7vkz4Ndsd_KixgDLS7Gg@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Relativistic synchronisation method
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: OLJp5PPCoOhAvlXJPHAmZMUYE2o
JNTP-ThreadID: YYnLTqUhhEGH779uk7wevDN2vH4
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=4-GlI_h7vkz4Ndsd_KixgDLS7Gg@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 24 12:22:32 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-12-16T12:22:32Z/9143512"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>
Bytes: 3566
Lines: 39

It seems that no one has clearly understood the "relativistic problem", 
and what a "relativistic synchronization method" is.
It seems especially that even Einstein, don't laugh friends, did not 
understand it, but attacking a living God to denounce him is not easy.
We must always, in all things, try to be fair, try to be true.
It is fair to say that Albert Einstein postulates, without explaining it, 
the invariance of the speed of the speed of light. It is a postulate.
For Hachel, postulating is not enough. We must explain, at the base, why.
Doctor Hachel, blessed be he and accepted in the Holy Lands of 
Aôôôllah, peace be upon him, speaks of a universal anisochrony, and 
claims, blessed be he and accepted in the Holy Lands of Aôôôllah, peace 
be upon him.
The principle is there, and if we affirm that any receiver receives live, 
in perfect cosmic simultaneity, in its hyperplane, any electromagnetic 
signal, it will easily come to mind, that this infinite, instantaneous 
speed of information is constant for any observer, and that it does not 
depend on the speed or direction of the source, nor on that of the 
receiver (which is moreover considered, for him, fixed in his frame of 
reference).
Once this is accepted (see the pdf of Dr. Hachel, blessed be he and 
accepted in the Holy Lands of Aôôôllah, peace be upon him) and accepted 
that the escape velocity of the wave is c/2 for any observer who emits, it 
comes that in synchronization M, M', M"", the speed of the TRANSVERSELY 
observed wave, that is to say neutral, will always be the same, and the 
average of the two other speeds.
We fall back, having explained it, on the constancy of the observable 
speed (transverse, neutral) of light.
This is what I explain in my pdf, on the question of the relativity of 
chronotropy after having discussed anisochrony (the primum movens). The 
moment is relative, chronotropy is relative too. It is a double 
relativity.
We will see that it is the same thing, with lengths and distances. One 
last word: it seems that physicists know perfectly well the notion of 
contraction of lengths and dilation of durations. What is very strange is 
that they have never been able to take the next step, and apply this also 
to DISTANCES and INSTANTS.

Or if they do, they do it badly.

R.H.