Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<402add06cf0b57ec9a75c762a14435ae@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Weakness in the results of the three tests of GR shown in rhe lasr
 century,.
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 23:06:22 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <402add06cf0b57ec9a75c762a14435ae@www.novabbs.com>
References: <52e47bd51177fb5ca4e51c4c255be1a6@www.novabbs.com> <f9055fa1d3095e2b1ee92758936dc749@www.novabbs.com> <9040987b21f80f4d564632566342812b@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3670686"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$8cka82no7CRbzhV4Tby8ZeEVswY4qVPcLS0GdVFacj50g1hGCz3N6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
Bytes: 1395
Lines: 6

Mr. Hertz: Yes, I read Smulsky a few years ago. He's good. He shows that
relativity is not necessary for Mercury's perihelion advance.

Why wouldn't the 43" be attributed to the imperfections of Gauss?

Regarding apples and oranges, using speed c for all planets throws more
off than it fixes Mercury.