Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<402add06cf0b57ec9a75c762a14435ae@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Weakness in the results of the three tests of GR shown in rhe lasr century,. Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 23:06:22 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <402add06cf0b57ec9a75c762a14435ae@www.novabbs.com> References: <52e47bd51177fb5ca4e51c4c255be1a6@www.novabbs.com> <f9055fa1d3095e2b1ee92758936dc749@www.novabbs.com> <9040987b21f80f4d564632566342812b@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3670686"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$8cka82no7CRbzhV4Tby8ZeEVswY4qVPcLS0GdVFacj50g1hGCz3N6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180 Bytes: 1395 Lines: 6 Mr. Hertz: Yes, I read Smulsky a few years ago. He's good. He shows that relativity is not necessary for Mercury's perihelion advance. Why wouldn't the 43" be attributed to the imperfections of Gauss? Regarding apples and oranges, using speed c for all planets throws more off than it fixes Mercury.