Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget)
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: A chat with AI on OoL
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:39:25 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <402f1e13ca68c65eca15b353b38f53af@www.novabbs.com>
References: <vjb8v7$1dedq$1@dont-email.me> <3ec92c64-9b0d-4505-8fb8-30979892a718@gmail.com> <c5sllj1tlq2elvft491flb18v3k0qade80@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="97228"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Return-Path: <news@i2pn2.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id 235C1229782; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:41:10 -0500 (EST)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5B74229765
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:41:07 -0500 (EST)
	by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTP id 4BCIf3rH402920
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:41:03 +0100
	id 349BB59803B; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:41:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Injection-Info: ;
	posting-account="fegc7bsF1eMdQ+K4/V59MDLZ0W7qYnKpXoBXaiJNWpk";
X-Rslight-Posting-User: e316cd0a5543fde25fc288f0018b16e943af38c6
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$SU6qqJtMiaErGow3KgTYJeYB3bUSpiB66NR2JUX2PMQ5/IFTRaX0W
Bytes: 2387
Lines: 16

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:21:46 +0000, Martin Harran wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:29:08 -0800, erik simpson


>>ChatGPT produces no information.  It rephrases what it's been told,
>>which sometimes makes it clearer.  In particular, the chirality problem
>>isn't a problem at all.
>
> That's an example of what I have just posted about in another thread.
> No matter what the scientists say, AI has decided that chirality *is*
> a problem so expect to see more and more output based on that
> assumption.

Echoing Erik, please don't use the term "assumption" respective
to AI. Regurgitation would be more appropriate.