| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<40d916dde692b6ef32f0de76d8336244ec1aae0c@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.hispagatos.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: sci.logic,comp.theory Subject: Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 21:59:18 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <40d916dde692b6ef32f0de76d8336244ec1aae0c@i2pn2.org> References: <1049cr4$10io1$1@dont-email.me> <104apto$1d6ik$1@dont-email.me> <104bfom$1hqln$3@dont-email.me> <104dc7p$22du8$1@dont-email.me> <104e2cd$2852a$2@dont-email.me> <104fvvp$2qvbi$1@dont-email.me> <104gjo8$2uc68$3@dont-email.me> <104ii2r$3egqg$1@dont-email.me> <104j9bp$3jrpl$3@dont-email.me> <104l99t$52fb$1@dont-email.me> <104lnfv$7l4q$3@dont-email.me> <104nvim$pg20$1@dont-email.me> <104ohhs$t0u4$2@dont-email.me> <e553507a65f31c62b7fc8c7360bb6168ec182cf4@i2pn2.org> <104ok8g$tkji$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 02:11:19 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="75090"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: <104ok8g$tkji$1@dont-email.me> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Content-Language: en-US On 7/10/25 10:55 AM, olcott wrote: > On 7/10/2025 9:38 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Thu, 10 Jul 2025 09:09:00 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>> On 7/10/2025 4:02 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 2025-07-09 12:31:59 +0000, olcott said: >> >>>>> It is a truism the the POE violates the requirement of truth >>>>> preserving operations. People that learn things by rote do not notice >>>>> this. >>>> The requirement of truth preserving operations only applies to proofs. > >>> According to the POE: >>> (a) The Moon is made of green cheese and (b) the Moon does not exist >>> proves that (c) Donald Trump is the Christ. > >> Correct. Since the moon is not, in fact, made of green cheese, this does >> not allow you deduce that Trump is christ (even if he were). It is a bit >> unintuitive, granted. >> > > As a demonstration of the principle, consider two contradictory > statements—"All lemons are yellow" and "Not all lemons are yellow"—and > suppose that both are true. If that is the case, anything can be proven, > e.g., the assertion that "unicorns exist", by using the following > argument: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion > > This the Moon exists and the Moon does not exist "proves" > that Donald Trump is the Christ. > > What it really proves is the modern symbolic logic is all F-cked up. > *My replacement to formal systems corrects this error* > No, it says that feed into a logic system lies, and you can get anything out. You logic show that.