Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies
 non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 07:17:23 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <41faed60fe479c519f01ead04b3c21175d7bff75@i2pn2.org>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vo7be3$jug$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo7r8d$36ra$3@dont-email.me> <vo9ura$i5ha$1@dont-email.me>
 <voahc5$m3dj$8@dont-email.me> <vocdo9$14kc0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vocpl7$16c4e$4@dont-email.me> <vof56u$1n9k0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vofnj2$1qh2r$2@dont-email.me> <vohrmi$29f46$1@dont-email.me>
 <vojs0e$2oikq$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:17:23 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="4036608"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vojs0e$2oikq$4@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2607
Lines: 37

On 2/12/25 11:21 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>>> Of course not. However, the fact that no reference to that article
>>>> before or when HHH
>>>
>>> That paper and its code are the only thing that I have been talking 
>>> about in this forum for several years.
>>
>> Doesn't matter when you don't say that you are talking about that paper.
>>
>> Anyway, that is irrelevant to the fact that the subject line contains
>> a false claim.
>>
> 
> It is a truism and not one person on the face of the
> Earth can possibly show otherwise.

No, your paper is just a LIE, and your statement is not a truism, and 
you are just proving that you are nothing but a stupid liar that doesn't 
understand what

> 
> Since there is a 5% chance that the treatment I will
> have next month will kill me and this treatment is
> my only good chance I will totally ignore anything
> that diverges from the point.
> 
> 

Since you were never "on" the point, since you don't understand the 
meaning of the terms you use, you have always just been wrong.

Part of your problem is you are so stuck in your own ideas, you refuse 
to even consider that you might be totally lost, and thus dive deeper 
into your false ideas.