| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<426rej1k1d9vg94nnjb62lj4eb7f10nsps@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:44:51 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 83 Message-ID: <426rej1k1d9vg94nnjb62lj4eb7f10nsps@4ax.com> References: <cicbejl8f1hppk447ao6jq1n295sj386f1@4ax.com> <pcgeejhh5j013bn1iqo15i5cod7267j15j@4ax.com> <20240915a@crcomp.net> <vc8hcj$2m25s$1@dont-email.me> <20240916a@crcomp.net> <92767bb42bc741f813f2a5a131e0ce5e@www.novabbs.com> <vcd5e0$3ognu$3@dont-email.me> <7mCGO.45460$xO0f.10030@fx48.iad> <ceff4cd0-7f16-0f42-588b-374e89acf00c@example.net> <52cc81bed1cd162e2275193fdf9989d3@www.novabbs.com> <vci3t1$na6i$2@dont-email.me> <0459600d-7ce7-33b6-0555-a1aee90fe285@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ab60328ce1d0ba0177df20ea1c3411b3"; logging-data="1231764"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/yo2icHFDKngKMzY+magOrfmvI0NauVSQ=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:TF0BGl1P//YefeEbEybJyRvjWQI= Bytes: 4402 On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:05:53 +0200, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > > >On Thu, 19 Sep 2024, Lynn McGuire wrote: > >> On 9/19/2024 3:03 PM, quadibloc wrote: >>> On 9/18/2024 2:49 PM, D wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Why was Svante Arrhenius wrong about CO2? >>>=20 >>>> Overestimation of Temperature Increase >>>> One of the primary reasons >>>> Arrhenius was considered wrong about CO2=92s impact on temperature = is that >>>> he significantly overestimated the effect of a doubling of CO2 >>>> concentration. >>>=20 >>> I'm not aware that scientists concerned about global warming >>> are going around insisting Svante Arrhenius' estimates were >>> right. >>>=20 >>>> Neglecting Water Vapor=92s Dominance >>>> Another critical factor in >>>> Arrhenius=92s miscalculations was his underestimation of water = vapor=92s >>>> role as a greenhouse gas. Water vapor constitutes a much larger = portion >>>> of the atmosphere compared to CO2 and has a more significant impact = on >>>> climate due to its higher concentration and ability to absorb heat >>>> across various wavelengths. While Arrhenius recognized CO2 as an >>>> important greenhouse gas, he did not adequately emphasize that its >>>> effects would be overshadowed by those of water vapor. >>>=20 >>> Now, this one is a total red herring. >>>=20 >>> The reason should be obvious. >>>=20 >>> What determines the level of water vapor in the atmosphere? Is it >>> being increased, say, by irrigation projects spraying water on >>> crops, which we should curtail before worrying about fossil >>> fuels? >>>=20 >>> No. The amount of water vapor in the atmosphere... is mostly due to >>> evaporation from the oceans and lakes and rivers. Which is controlled >>> by global temperatures. >>>=20 >>> So water vapor is part of a feedback loop that amplifies the effects >>> of extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Because the carbon dioxide >>> level is a *free* variable, that we're affecting significantly by our >>> use of fossil fuels. >>>=20 >>> John Savard >> >> We have extra water in the upper atmosphere right now due to the = underwater=20 >> volcano spewing water vapor, "Tonga Eruption May Temporarily Push = Earth=20 >> Closer to 1.5=B0C of Warming" >> = https://eos.org/articles/tonga-eruption-may-temporarily-push-earth-closer= -to-1-5c-of-warming >> >> "The underwater eruption of Hunga Tonga=96Hunga Ha=91apai sent = megatons of water=20 >> vapor into the stratosphere, contributing to an increase in global = warming=20 >> over the next 5 years." >> >> Lynn > >Let me just add a note here, that this was a natural process and not man= =20 >made. Then perhaps it should be pointed out that it is also /temporary/ and not part of the secular increase in global temperature, which is not temporary. --=20 "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino, Who evil spoke of everyone but God, Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"