Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<426rej1k1d9vg94nnjb62lj4eb7f10nsps@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:44:51 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 83
Message-ID: <426rej1k1d9vg94nnjb62lj4eb7f10nsps@4ax.com>
References: <cicbejl8f1hppk447ao6jq1n295sj386f1@4ax.com> <pcgeejhh5j013bn1iqo15i5cod7267j15j@4ax.com> <20240915a@crcomp.net> <vc8hcj$2m25s$1@dont-email.me> <20240916a@crcomp.net> <92767bb42bc741f813f2a5a131e0ce5e@www.novabbs.com> <vcd5e0$3ognu$3@dont-email.me> <7mCGO.45460$xO0f.10030@fx48.iad> <ceff4cd0-7f16-0f42-588b-374e89acf00c@example.net> <52cc81bed1cd162e2275193fdf9989d3@www.novabbs.com> <vci3t1$na6i$2@dont-email.me> <0459600d-7ce7-33b6-0555-a1aee90fe285@example.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:44:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ab60328ce1d0ba0177df20ea1c3411b3";
	logging-data="1231764"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/yo2icHFDKngKMzY+magOrfmvI0NauVSQ="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TF0BGl1P//YefeEbEybJyRvjWQI=
Bytes: 4402

On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 10:05:53 +0200, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

>
>
>On Thu, 19 Sep 2024, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>
>> On 9/19/2024 3:03 PM, quadibloc wrote:
>>> On 9/18/2024 2:49 PM, D wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> Why was Svante Arrhenius wrong about CO2?
>>>=20
>>>> Overestimation of Temperature Increase
>>>> One of the primary reasons
>>>> Arrhenius was considered wrong about CO2=92s impact on temperature =
is that
>>>> he significantly overestimated the effect of a doubling of CO2
>>>> concentration.
>>>=20
>>> I'm not aware that scientists concerned about global warming
>>> are going around insisting Svante Arrhenius' estimates were
>>> right.
>>>=20
>>>> Neglecting Water Vapor=92s Dominance
>>>> Another critical factor in
>>>> Arrhenius=92s miscalculations was his underestimation of water =
vapor=92s
>>>> role as a greenhouse gas. Water vapor constitutes a much larger =
portion
>>>> of the atmosphere compared to CO2 and has a more significant impact =
on
>>>> climate due to its higher concentration and ability to absorb heat
>>>> across various wavelengths. While Arrhenius recognized CO2 as an
>>>> important greenhouse gas, he did not adequately emphasize that its
>>>> effects would be overshadowed by those of water vapor.
>>>=20
>>> Now, this one is a total red herring.
>>>=20
>>> The reason should be obvious.
>>>=20
>>> What determines the level of water vapor in the atmosphere? Is it
>>> being increased, say, by irrigation projects spraying water on
>>> crops, which we should curtail before worrying about fossil
>>> fuels?
>>>=20
>>> No. The amount of water vapor in the atmosphere... is mostly due to
>>> evaporation from the oceans and lakes and rivers. Which is controlled
>>> by global temperatures.
>>>=20
>>> So water vapor is part of a feedback loop that amplifies the effects
>>> of extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Because the carbon dioxide
>>> level is a *free* variable, that we're affecting significantly by our
>>> use of fossil fuels.
>>>=20
>>> John Savard
>>
>> We have extra water in the upper atmosphere right now due to the =
underwater=20
>> volcano spewing water vapor, "Tonga Eruption May Temporarily Push =
Earth=20
>> Closer to 1.5=B0C of Warming"
>> =
https://eos.org/articles/tonga-eruption-may-temporarily-push-earth-closer=
-to-1-5c-of-warming
>>
>> "The underwater eruption of Hunga Tonga=96Hunga Ha=91apai sent =
megatons of water=20
>> vapor into the stratosphere, contributing to an increase in global =
warming=20
>> over the next 5 years."
>>
>> Lynn
>
>Let me just add a note here, that this was a natural process and not man=
=20
>made.

Then perhaps it should be pointed out that it is also /temporary/ and
not part of the secular increase in global temperature, which is not
temporary.
--=20
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"