Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Computable Functions --- finite string transformation rules --- 0
 =?UTF-8?B?4omgMQ==?=
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:06:27 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <434e3c1e34eb9a181339b51c95a89de38e612d4d@i2pn2.org>
References: <vsnchj$23nrb$2@dont-email.me>
	<7ac75991b443ba53d52960ddb1932524dea8e03f@i2pn2.org>
	<40b048f71fe2ed2a8ef11d2d587c765c8fcbc977@i2pn2.org>
	<bf0ee557f7c0eba386944a4551e607895c620d44@i2pn2.org>
	<vue9im$2d7t8$5@dont-email.me>
	<09bba11868dafecb6800ba8aec152304fec97553@i2pn2.org>
	<vuej7d$2md4c$1@dont-email.me>
	<51a4be0ebc0ddc76954fd2e5ec1c5951b5f306e3@i2pn2.org>
	<vug1gc$116u$1@dont-email.me>
	<6bd35d1c5fb0d281a29dc8e56458f2b83f63d878@i2pn2.org>
	<vugl27$it5g$2@dont-email.me> <vui73e$217h6$1@dont-email.me>
	<vuj0rf$2lf64$5@dont-email.me> <vukunp$i1sb$1@dont-email.me>
	<vulsm7$1bf1j$6@dont-email.me> <vungbu$2ujct$1@dont-email.me>
	<vuo99r$3jn5n$4@dont-email.me> <vuo9aq$3dd6e$4@dont-email.me>
	<vuohjk$3td7u$2@dont-email.me> <vuohst$3dd6e$6@dont-email.me>
	<vuojet$3td7u$6@dont-email.me> <vuojqg$3dd6e$11@dont-email.me>
	<vuomc0$1pcj$3@dont-email.me> <vuomsu$3dd6e$13@dont-email.me>
	<vuonb6$2gnd$2@dont-email.me> <vuoo47$2tu0$5@dont-email.me>
	<vuot4h$7n8s$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 10:06:27 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2375094"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2789
Lines: 19

Am Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:49:05 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 4/28/2025 3:23 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 28.apr.2025 om 22:10 schreef olcott:
>>> On 4/28/2025 3:02 PM, dbush wrote:

>>>> So when you hypothesize changing the code of the function HHH, you're
>>>> hypothesizing changing the input algorithm DD.
>>>> Changing the input is not allowed.
>>> Of the freaking infinite set of every damn HHH/DD pair that can
>>> possibly exist where DD is emulated by HHH according to the finite
>>> string transformation rules of the x86 language NOT A DAMN ONE OF THE
>>> EMULATED DD HALTS.
>> Because they all were prevented to halt by HHH, which aborts the
>> simulation prematurely.
> Factually incorrect and apparently way over your head.
Does HHH not abort?

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.