Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 16:14:49 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <4453bc0c1141c540852ea2223a7fedefc93f564c@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq6g9l$1ptg9$2@dont-email.me>
	<vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me> <vq751g$1t7oc$1@dont-email.me>
	<vq78ni$1u8bl$3@dont-email.me>
	<5e786c32c2dcc88be50183203781dcb6a5d8d046@i2pn2.org>
	<vq866t$23nt0$1@dont-email.me>
	<2002d599ebdfb7cd5a023881ab2faca9801b219d@i2pn2.org>
	<vq8l3d$29b9l$1@dont-email.me>
	<4426787ad065bfd0939e10b937f3b8b2798d0578@i2pn2.org>
	<vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me>
	<920b573567d204a5c792425b09097d79ee098fa5@i2pn2.org>
	<vq9lvn$2ei4j$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 16:14:49 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2930127"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3573
Lines: 42

Am Wed, 05 Mar 2025 08:10:00 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 3/5/2025 6:19 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 3/5/25 12:09 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:

>>>>>>>>>> So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction,
>>>>>>>>>> where the direct execution and some world-class simulators have
>>>>>>>>>> no problem to reach it.
>>>>>>>>> DD calls its own emulator when emulated by HHH.
>>>>>>>>> DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when emulated by HHH1. DD DOES
>>>>>>>>> NOT call its own emulator when directly executed.
>>>>>>>> Which just show your stupidity, as DD doesn't HAVE its own
>>>>>>>> emulator, and CAN'T know who or if it is being emulated.
>>>>>>> It is not my stupidity it is your dishonestly using the straw-man
>>>>>>> deception to change the subject away from:
>>>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>>>> WHich is the strawman, that you are too stupid to recogines.
>>>>> I will show that it is not straw-man after you quit dodging that
>>>>> point.
>>>> Wrong order,
>>> I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY OTHER ORDER
>> In other words, you CAN'T handle any other order, even though logically
>> requried, because you need to hide your fraud.
> My proof requires a specific  prerequisite order.
> One cannot learn algebra before one has learned to count to ten. 
> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
> instruction and terminate normally.
> Is the first step of the mandatory prerequisite order of my proof
What is the next step?

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.