Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:23:47 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <4499228db4f8cd5606f334146e4c86c7c654a2f8@i2pn2.org>
References: <vmo1bs$1rnl$1@dont-email.me> <vokmsi$2t0ls$1@dont-email.me>
 <8a4c44c4ba0d3260a90d463acfa814fbc83f557a@i2pn2.org>
 <voktdg$2tt35$1@dont-email.me>
 <853f9685ed5be27fedb6486ca2931ef189b920df@i2pn2.org>
 <vonjm5$3ghe5$1@dont-email.me>
 <5aefc0d0b454a230e721a8cdb8400cb25ea9a8c1@i2pn2.org>
 <vonqus$3hu2d$1@dont-email.me>
 <f220383b9803059a387c34e198906c7729101311@i2pn2.org>
 <vopv2h$s46$2@dont-email.me>
 <340761ab1ceb68741d949331a0c64a3d6d5fa237@i2pn2.org>
 <vosf9f$hjfh$4@dont-email.me>
 <e65f39b64ea4a5bb0fd1b8d214fbf99c4a5a0b23@i2pn2.org>
 <vot6hr$lfa0$3@dont-email.me>
 <5fccdbd91a997aadcfde3843cdc09e3fe7f515cf@i2pn2.org>
 <vp02ic$188u3$1@dont-email.me> <ffff63c4-18ef-4093-a262-88a6ffe2bac1@att.net>
 <vp1hra$1k723$1@dont-email.me>
 <a5c5c24b1e2ea68295fd8888cb213365d2fba9bf@i2pn2.org>
 <vp28cs$1o28v$3@dont-email.me>
 <453a56f5a2e8545cd171150970864c62ecff7442@i2pn2.org>
 <vp299s$1o28v$5@dont-email.me>
 <1c8c4e43283da583e55f14e9b54c0d8f07864c88@i2pn2.org>
 <vp4pr4$fdmd$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:23:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="870737"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vp4pr4$fdmd$1@solani.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2616
Lines: 20

On 2/19/25 9:28 AM, WM wrote:
> Am 18.02.2025 um 17:45 schrieb joes:
>> Am Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:34:20 +0100 schrieb WM:
> 
>>> We can remove every FISON without changing the *assumed* union ℕ.
>> It doesn’t matter what you assume the union to be. You quite sensibly
>> denied that it is empty, yet you claim it would (not? I’m confused)
>> change.
> 
> It is enough to show that the claimed union is mistaken.
> Regards, WM
> 
> 

SInce the set you are "making" isn't defined as a set in a proper set 
theory, it doesn't prove anything.

The fact that you think induction makes a set, shows that you don't 
undetstand proper set theory.

Sorry, you are just revealing your utter stupidity and ignorance.