Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<44h6e14sb3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lowell Gilbert <lgusenet@be-well.ilk.org> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: ASCII to ASCII compression. Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 19:20:16 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 42 Message-ID: <44h6e14sb3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <v3snu1$1io29$2@dont-email.me> <v3t2bn$1ksfn$1@dont-email.me> <v3t9hf$1m1oh$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 01:20:17 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6399fe587ef66b55560eb82904d73036"; logging-data="4068858"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+cNLYnavRrO3ibHffNFlk" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WWehgH9LpSMwFa8ppNNy9rZP/CA= sha1:lAFh4WSZCPAbE3ZOyKbDf38IFkc= Bytes: 2812 Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes: > On 06/06/2024 20:23, Paul wrote: >> On 6/6/2024 12:25 PM, Malcolm McLean wrote: >>> >>> Not strictly a C programming question, but smart people will see the relavance to the topicality, which is portability. >>> >>> Is there a compresiion algorthim which converts human language ASCII text to compressed ASCII, preferably only "isgraph" characters? >>> >>> So "Mary had a little lamb, its fleece was white as snow". >>> >>> Would become >>> >>> QWE£$543GtT£$"||x|VVBB? >>> >> The purpose of doing this, is to satisfy transmission through a 7 >> bit channel. >> In the history of networking, not all channels were eight-bit transparent. >> (On the equipment in question, this was called "robbed-bit signaling.) >> For example, BASE64 is valued for its 7 bit channel properties, the ability >> to pass through a pipe which is not 8 bit transparent. Even to this day, >> your email attachments may traverse the network in BASE64 format. >> That is one reason, that email or USENET clients to this day, have >> both 7 bit and 8 bit content encoding methods. It's to handle the >> unlikely possibility that 7 bit transmission channels still exist. >> They likely do exist. >> > Yes. If yiu stire data as 8 but binaries then it's inherently > risky. There's usually no recovery froma single bit gett corrupted. > > Whilst if you store as ASCII, the data can usually be recovered very > easly if something goes wrong wit the phsyical storage. A "And God > said" > becomes "And G$d said", an even with this tiny text, you can still read > it perfectly well. That example only works because it doesn't include compression. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/