Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH ---
 Richard proves that he is clueless
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:27:41 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <45260538f600fb766bcae4e5bee4b6dcf3b3b115@i2pn2.org>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v5vocu$1oanb$10@i2pn2.org>
 <v5vp03$1fbi8$1@dont-email.me> <v5vpht$1oana$8@i2pn2.org>
 <v5vrac$1fg22$2@dont-email.me> <v5vrnq$1oana$10@i2pn2.org>
 <v5vsff$1fqfa$2@dont-email.me>
 <e9c681b90a30f1c1c0b14c970675c5d6b104f535@i2pn2.org>
 <v60se2$1kr1q$5@dont-email.me>
 <04db95a103cfbcb76bd6082752ed89932cfce5d5@i2pn2.org>
 <v620nf$1qutj$1@dont-email.me>
 <adab42d299905f4219330596cccb5184f5e09597@i2pn2.org>
 <v621b9$1qutj$3@dont-email.me>
 <95b8d2686a17a5fee6b5811ca115c902fbc7b17a@i2pn2.org>
 <v629fd$1s632$2@dont-email.me>
 <c6747d2097a1946c7ebbe140882831375219deea@i2pn2.org>
 <v62aa6$1s632$4@dont-email.me>
 <5b7927d3326970682c6165aa8d2b4bccee65df37@i2pn2.org>
 <v62b0t$1s632$5@dont-email.me>
 <f0b106f793e07d23ba6ac455dc795552de5a6d73@i2pn2.org>
 <v62bth$1s632$7@dont-email.me>
 <a6c36193b3d7181f8e63fc3b53aee6b7da47d792@i2pn2.org>
 <v62de5$20moo$1@dont-email.me>
 <6c12c412fecfad2eec6f3c3776de9aa9785ad374@i2pn2.org>
 <v62ffc$20moo$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 03:27:41 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1962626"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v62ffc$20moo$4@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3965
Lines: 52

On 7/2/24 11:10 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 7/2/2024 9:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 7/2/24 10:35 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/2/2024 9:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 7/2/24 10:09 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 7/2/2024 8:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/2/24 9:54 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/2/2024 8:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/2/24 9:42 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Tarski proof directly provides the detailed inference steps.
>>>>>>>>> So it is not that I do under understand the Gödel proof it is that
>>>>>>>>> this proof is opaque completely hiding all of the important 
>>>>>>>>> details.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, you miss the fact that you are starting in the MIDDLE of an 
>>>>>>>> arguement, and that what you are thinking as a assumption is a 
>>>>>>>> proven statement (which you don't understand)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can't correct my error because you know that you have no 
>>>>>>> understanding of the Tarski proof. It is the same tactic as
>>>>>>> always dishonestly deflect rather than make any attempt to
>>>>>>> correct to hide the fact that you are clueless.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope, I WON'T correct your error, because you have proved yourself 
>>>>>> to be a LIAR.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You just proved that you are clueless.
>>>>
>>>> Why, becasue I won't help a proven liar?
>>>>
>>>> You have proven that you do not have the necessary background to 
>>>> understand it, and even if you did you would just LIE about what it 
>>>> says, just like you always do.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Dishonest dodge. I just looked up my rebuttal again.
>>>
>>
>> So? You still haven't shown you understand what was actually being said.
>>
> 
> I posted another whole thread that skipped his
> steps and proved that his conclusion is wrong.
> Reply only to this: *Tarski didn't understand truth-maker theory*
> 

And where is the thread by that EXACT subhect.

You don't even seem to know what you said.