Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<457d97feb9c089a203b8afee3cfdb495@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The truth about the Lorentz Transformation. Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:01:34 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <457d97feb9c089a203b8afee3cfdb495@www.novabbs.com> References: <152fdece6d8ad07399662b8718f94e75@www.novabbs.com> <3fcb985b3950191bf86fb7ca9da3697a@www.novabbs.com> <17f6a3fbfe247560$1246842$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2647051"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$2cj4ymF.7a5SgX1u8YZD..up6CF1DBDB/18ZFP.juO1MIY92wotQu Bytes: 2400 Lines: 34 On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:10:10 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 19.09.2024 o 13:58, gharnagel pisze: > > > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 3:16:44 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > > > > > > In reality, the LT is the difference in time taken for the > transverse > > > and longitudinal beams. > > > Like with a river current, the longitudinal motion will be delayed > more > > > than the transverse. > > > This is the difference that should have been detected by the > > > Michelson-Morley experiment. > > > As with water that is not flowing, we don't need these equations > without > > > an ether. > > > Since relativity does not involve an ether, applying the Lorentz > > > Transformation in this context is nonsensical. > > > > So what are you trying to say? > > (1) "We need the LT because there IS an ether." > > (2) "We don't need the LT because there is no ether." > > (3) You have no idea what you're trying to say. > > > > I submit that (1) and (2) are false. > > And that GPS clocks can't be real, as they don't > want to fit the delusions of your idiot guru. As is his usual wont, Wozniak is garbling GR with SR in a sorry attempt to get his name in print to stroke his narcissistic ego. And as he is inclined to do: insult, slander and lie. The truth has long legs and overtakes Wozniak's short legs.