Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve
 starlight.
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:06:25 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <469efb0cbe09e1f72d64fca9c2f24dfb@www.novabbs.com>
References: <6b0c7e8c846682004d455d379716128c@www.novabbs.com> <a594f9da668554342e9778d771bce7a8@www.novabbs.com> <89cd74f3047884327042a8ed2ad4ce29@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3256500"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$dCBwzZj1vYj0lfzia0YmtuP4R4koyO.QZ8mKzxZGIjPMEhyx5weFq
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
Bytes: 2015
Lines: 12

Mr. Hertz: As you probably are aware, rational wiki is the sort of
skeptical publication that is only skeptical of alternative views and
not of mainstream views. Contrary to their report, which involves itself
in guilt by association by referring to a mythologist supporter, his
ideas are accepted by Alexander Unzicker [in his book, "The Liquid
Sun"], a reputable physicist. As you know, physics publications are
governed by a process of political censoring called the referee process
in dark back rooms. I see Prok approves of such filthy scheming
practices. Relativity has long refused to engage with critics, including
in this forum, where stonewalling tactics by stubborn dogmatists do not
convince the many skeptics who consult this forum. They would better
defend relativity by resorting to reason and ascertaining the intended
meaning in comments instead of misconstruing like an ideologue.