Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Extensive article on Rivendell and Grant Petersen
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 16:30:28 +0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <46l7fjtg3ke9hi2hikq2d4632iv2p40ufj@4ax.com>
References: <l2h3fjdkfie6ht4dscca6n3ulq7thv0l0k@4ax.com> <vcsipj$2rfcq$2@dont-email.me> <blm3fj1rj43cu4465m83on9pq3ul18ir0p@4ax.com> <vcsmlk$2s44j$1@dont-email.me> <vct3ic$2tr2a$1@dont-email.me> <sls4fj914qnt9is0crvsd4dpli978v8ebt@4ax.com> <vcukup$37v5r$5@dont-email.me> <jvl5fjt14puvrscsra3jrjj2lgr22qhhdq@4ax.com> <vcuvih$39ji0$4@dont-email.me> <oq26fjpl0hc62vq4jpe50htdoavd26mcgu@4ax.com> <vcvr4o$3hhf0$1@dont-email.me> <pnQIO.1160654$grz1.912786@fx03.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:30:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1c68c5718764d0215a1d3a2e4f3210f9";
	logging-data="3827648"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+tn47M4iu+dmMTTT9l5g5EgUWMHPazNtQ="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2pyDUeH1DM18V239kfie391oFqs=
Bytes: 2925

On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 09:05:25 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com>
wrote:

>Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> On 9/24/2024 3:17 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:14:41 -0400, Frank Krygowski
>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> You might do well to read some of the archives of this group. There have
>>>> always been people posting opinions that were factually wrong, and there
>>>> have always been people pointing out those mistakes. As I've noted
>>>> earlier, having mistakes pointed out is a necessary part of the process
>>>> of education.
>>> 
>>> That's fine of the person being corrected understands that the
>>> corrector is qualified to do so and is truly interested in making
>>> things better. In my opinion, you fall far short of both those
>>> standards.
>> 
>> Your opinion on that matter is worthless. You don't have anywhere near 
>> the background needed to judge technical proficiency. Professional 
>> Engineering licensing boards of two different states have disagreed with 
>> you, not to mention those conferring my engineering degrees and those 
>> institutions for whom I've worked.

And what makes your opinion have any meaning? OH, of course your
Engineer Board test was chuck just full of questions about
bicycles...right?

By the way before you get to bragging too loud about those tests I
might say that I reviewed the Florida test in the very early '50s and
decided that they were of no value to me. So, at least I've seen them.

-- 
Cheers,

John B.