Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 13:41:37 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <4818d5b3c4f06ccc707001e1f17f0a68@www.novabbs.com>
References: <7f48b61d2779066c75b739a1afd4eb80@www.novabbs.com> <vd0t61$3lvnd$1@dont-email.me> <ebe353415ea822a2b9505c8fc635081c@www.novabbs.com> <9fddf2b19888f8325ff11b4568ba31df@www.novabbs.com> <kM_IO.774584$b6j.701697@fx11.ams4> <87ba83c89bd6f1488741edd2ec3b88a9@www.novabbs.com> <14be7832a6e83c0f83dd0b3b5c04b896@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3581213"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="ovbq/l84ala/wLhXSqScU9GOSIzjukMrxJB27Aq7eyg";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: c1a997029c70f718720f72156b7d7f56416caf7c
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$7IpXJes3bS1HqoMzL66IA.VNRks0ofVUvfHaFjeomxCz5UUxy666G
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2159
Lines: 22

On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 1:14:54 +0000, rhertz wrote:

> If you want, we could RE-DISCUSS another HOAX: 1961 Pound-Rebka, or any
> other "classic proof" of relativity of your choice.

I won't waste time arguing with you, but I will merely refer you to
this article in Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound%E2%80%93Rebka_experiment

In additional to 86% text authorship, I was responsible for the SVG
diagram and the animations.

> I mean "classic" by "historical", not the modern crap, which is much
> worse and authored by 10-15-20 imbeciles fraudsters.

Modern measurements greatly tighten the error bars.

At some level of measurement precision, it is expected that the
equivalence principle must eventually break down. So far it hasn't.

Gravitational redshift measurements provide a direct measure of
local position invariance, one of the three hypotheses underlying
the equivalence principle.