Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 11:23:01 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <485f4f6a9550c11ae74f6fc579ccf4ba@www.novabbs.com>
References: <Q3udnQ_BXvnebXX7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3566736"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="jh4HcpQ+hhhSYfMNELHwaYsVz4DxLTJw0pxiKoD05d4";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cdf973c28ddff5d1d1235bf54e7ff9676b462801
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$3juL69nwReXXWRANP5CjIu1cCe8Bagupjpw07fxTtlnh6BV6UUX06
Bytes: 1469
Lines: 13

On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 2:58:17 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:

> Does anybody even bother to think about vis-viva versus vis-motrix
> anymore, with regards to conservation, momentum, inertia, and energy,
> and potential and impulse energy?
>
> Is it usually considered at all that momentum and inertia change
> places with respect to resistance to change of motion and rest
> respectively sort of back and forth in the theory since antiquity?
>
> Several times?

Check out Arindam's physics.
Discuss in detail if you dare.