Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <4AWIaLMopGT1GC7PL2qXanj8Vec@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law 
 violations in electrodynamics
References: <uvb7db$2bj35$1@tor.dont-email.me> <e7b18fbbd25aef1edf75d3fd7baa053a@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: RtY4kN3ke1F2MfxKgaFanh-2_RY
JNTP-ThreadID: uvb7db$2bj35$1@tor.dont-email.me
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=4AWIaLMopGT1GC7PL2qXanj8Vec@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 24 06:36:56 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/121.0.0.0
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="601f4a4a60dc6043f0c3ab83656fd85fb6bc327d"; logging-data="2024-04-27T06:36:56Z/8833185"; posting-account="219@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Bytes: 4929
Lines: 79

Le 27/04/2024 à 12:28, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) a écrit :
> Aether Regained wrote:
> 
>> @ArindamBanerjee
> 
>> I took a look at your video of your 'recoil-less' rail gun:
> 
>> My Movie8feb2022
> 
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> 
>> My first impression was that, there is an obvious recoil of the 'gun' or
>> rails+supercapacitors section, but you claim in the description that:
> 
>> "... we are creating momentum from internal energy/force in this
>> experiment. The heavy (3Kg) armature is accelerated by electromagnetic
>> forces. There is a recoil, the rest of the apparatus weighs 4.3Kg - BUT
>> THAT IS DUE TO THE FRICTION FROM THE ROLLING ARMATURE. ...  As I have
>> shown in my other videos, the force that accelerates the armature has
>> very little recoil, and this new effect can be used to make reactionless
>> motors for the proper conquest of space."
> 
>> You have worked on this for a long time, but I think you are maybe
>> overlooking that whatever electromagnetic forces act on the current
>> flowing through the rolling bar/'armature', near [*] exactly opposite
>> electromagnetic forces will act on the other end of the rails, i.e., on
>> the oppositely flowing current through the supercapacitors, and the
>> center-of-mass of the whole system will remain near stationary.
> 
> That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force does NOT 
> have an equal and opposite reaction.
> Your point is merely theoretical.
> My evidence is experimental.
> 
>> [*] It is well known that in electrodynamics, Newton's 3rd law is
>> inexact, namely it will appear to be violated if the momentum in the
>> aether or em field is not also considered. I urge you to carefully read
>> FLP-II:26-2, especially the last paragraph, and also FLP-II:27-6 on the
>> (Electromagnetic) Field Momentum.
> 
> I urge you to repeat my experiments honestly and competently instead of 
> persisting with theory proved wrong.
> 
>> https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_27.html#Ch27-S6
> 
>> "FLP-II:27-6: We pointed out in Section 26–2 the failure of the law of
>> action and reaction when two charged particles were moving on orthogonal
>> trajectories. The forces on the two particles don’t balance out, so the
>> action and reaction are not equal; therefore the net momentum of the
>> matter must be changing. It is not conserved. But the momentum in the
>> field is also changing in such a situation. If you work out the amount
>> of momentum given by the Poynting vector, it is not constant. HOWEVER,
>> THE CHANGE OF THE PARTICLE MOMENTA IS JUST MADE UP BY THE FIELD
>> MOMENTUM, SO THE TOTAL MOMENTUM OF PARTICLES PLUS FIELD IS CONSERVED."
> 
> Blah blah. Theoretical stuff. One may as well say the sun goes around the Earth 
> because holy books and great people and Aristotle say so.
> 
>> I think it is premature to believe that your inconclusive results can be
>> the basis of a space motor. For that purpose, you may want to take a
>> look at PROJECT ORION:
> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)
> 
>> which is a design by the late Freeman Dyson, that works, and does not
>> involve continuously ejecting mass.
> 
> Diversion, how unscientific. 
> 
> Disgusted.
> 
> bt (The ghostly cyberdogs of Arindam who know better physics than Nobel 
> laureates)

Good boys, Bertie and Tyler. 
Pat-pat.
"When will they ever learn?"

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee