Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Verified facts regarding the software engineering of DDD, HHH,
 and HHH1 --- TYPO
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:23:47 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <4abd6615b2730699ecc474d01b97163917e0b01d@i2pn2.org>
References: <vf3eu5$fbb3$2@dont-email.me> <vf5lln$v6n5$2@dont-email.me>
 <a9302e42f51777b34f4a7c695247ea98f0f060ad@i2pn2.org>
 <vf5vi4$10jkk$1@dont-email.me>
 <3db3ceb1eac447b89c8c740dbba31774eeb1ad99@i2pn2.org>
 <vf6loq$136ja$1@dont-email.me>
 <9a91d75b6beb959665d2a042677ef61f444608a5@i2pn2.org>
 <vf6mt7$136ja$2@dont-email.me>
 <ad43f56a12181e10f59b8a1e6220ed7989b6c973@i2pn2.org>
 <vf74oh$1a8oo$1@dont-email.me>
 <525ed75662589a150afa1ea268b199a166a7b98b@i2pn2.org>
 <vf8ads$1gkf5$1@dont-email.me>
 <13583474d25855e665daa98d91605e958f5cf472@i2pn2.org>
 <vf8i1g$1h5mj$4@dont-email.me>
 <45ea7a6da46453c9da62c1149fa1cf7739218c5f@i2pn2.org>
 <vf9qai$1scol$1@dont-email.me>
 <2a210ab064b3a8c3397600b4fe87aa390868bb12@i2pn2.org>
 <vf9sk6$1sfva$2@dont-email.me>
 <4c67570b4898e14665bde2dfdf473130b89b7dd4@i2pn2.org>
 <vfaqe7$21k64$1@dont-email.me>
 <f789d3ef27e3000f04feb3df4fc561c5da02381f@i2pn2.org>
 <vfc96p$2b6h0$1@dont-email.me>
 <74edcca800e7af74169cea47cb8f1715d3a5145f@i2pn2.org>
 <vfdihe$2kvn4$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:23:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3525407"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vfdihe$2kvn4$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4660
Lines: 73

On 10/24/24 9:36 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 10/23/2024 9:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 10/23/24 9:51 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> ChatGPT does completely understand this.
>>>
>>
>> But, it is just a stupid idiot that has been taught to repeat what it 
>> has been told.
>>
> 
> It is a brilliant genius that seems to infallibly deduce all
> of the subtle nuances of each of the consequences on the basis
> of a set of premises.

I guess you don't undetstand how "Large Language Models work, do you.

It has NO actual intelegence, or ability to "deduce" nuances, it is just 
a massive pattern matching system.

All you are doing is proving how little you understand about what you 
are talking about,

Remember, at the bottom of the page is a WARNING that it can make 
mistakes. And feeding it LIES, like you do is one easy way to do that.

> 
> The key is that the conversation cannot have more than 4000
> words. When 4000 words are exceeded ChatGPT starts acting like
> it has dementia.
> 

So, if it actually know what was right, you wouldn't need to 
"re-program" it with your ideas, it would just know the truth, and be 
able to answer about it.

All you are showing is that you need to work hard to convince it that 
you idea are a viable basis to shape its procesing.

>> It seems you are nothing but a stupid idiot that believe what you have 
>> told yourselfg.
>>
> 
> If this was true then someone would have been able to find
> an actual error in my work.

We have, you are just too stupid to understad.

The fact that you keep on repeating in just shows how utterly stupid you 
are,

> 
> Mike can't even seem to pay attention to what changes the
> execution trace of DDD emulated by HHH relative to DDD
> emulated by HHH1. All that he can do is take an incorrect
> guess without bothering to pay attention.
> 
>> All you are doing with all this talk about Chat GPT agreeing with you 
>> is proving that you know you arguement is so bad, the only thing with 
>> any form of intelgence that will believe you is a program with only 
>> artificial intelegence.
>>
>> Sorry, yolu are just proving how stupid your ideas are.
> 
> ChatGPT does seem to infallibly understand every nuance of the 
> consequences that follow from my premises. No one can show otherwise.
> ChatGPT can also validate the most important key assumptions of
> these premises. No one can show otherwise.
> 

IF it seems so to you, that just shows how stupid and ignorant you are.

The fact that with just a short comment to it, I got it to admit that 
DDD does Halt and HHH was wrong to say its input was non-halting just 
proves your claim is a lie.