Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly
 emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 19:53:42 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <4ae7f93adfcbe33c589ded0288f4e38c97d503fa.camel@gmail.com>
References: <v8o47a$3ml4$1@dont-email.me>
	 <0ec454016dab6f6d6dd5580f5d0eea49569293d8@i2pn2.org>
	 <v8oigl$6kik$1@dont-email.me>
	 <6ec9812649b0f4a042edd1e9a1c14b93e7b9a16b@i2pn2.org>
	 <v8ol2g$74lk$1@dont-email.me>
	 <476303ac27d94a26dd563468f0ce10407e60034c@i2pn2.org>
	 <v8oqfc$8767$1@dont-email.me>
	 <ce9b3873fa013760b85c7f73e59456b6f2f0edbe@i2pn2.org>
	 <v8otj0$8oip$1@dont-email.me>
	 <5ea40e29a4d8e4014f485fdfda743b95148a961a@i2pn2.org>
	 <v8ouh4$905l$1@dont-email.me>
	 <7f796739dcafa335aff88a52af5e458d1253625b@i2pn2.org>
	 <v8p10u$9ebu$1@dont-email.me>
	 <de071bb436f1e79bc9645b5abbb1bea182d9f3e0@i2pn2.org>
	 <v8p36o$9pm8$1@dont-email.me>
	 <35c5358982b75ccc36bc041f980dd152f1b5c6a3@i2pn2.org>
	 <v8p8le$aj5a$1@dont-email.me>
	 <ff44c6626923661554540bf75cb50a4921a50381@i2pn2.org>
	 <v8peiv$fgqd$1@dont-email.me>
	 <569060964dc985138884a3bdff8d0157a52af40e@i2pn2.org>
	 <v8pil5$g6tu$2@dont-email.me>
	 <19eca01abd992432a5b58232c1dbb6506fa53e44@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 13:53:43 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="55752b9b5e739a3f81cfe9d239534150";
	logging-data="704363"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18x2ueF7S5b/AMMGnZRJ2yl"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:d4ewg8Qv5Ze+QjW434lpjJ9VGRc=
In-Reply-To: <19eca01abd992432a5b58232c1dbb6506fa53e44@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 4163

On Mon, 2024-08-05 at 07:40 -0400, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/4/24 11:58 PM, olcott wrote:
> > On 8/4/2024 10:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > On 8/4/24 10:49 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > On 8/4/2024 9:18 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > On 8/4/24 9:07 PM, olcott wrote:>>
> > > > > > void DDD()
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0 HHH(DDD);
> > > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0 return;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly
> > > > > > emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own "return"
> > > > > > instruction.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > No, I admit that *IF* HHH does correctly (and thus completely=20
> > > > > without aborting) emulated its input, then THAT DDD and ONLY that=
=20
> > > > > DDD will be non-halting.
> > > > >=20
> > > >=20
> > > > See there?
> > > >=20
> > > > DDD correctly emulated by any HHH that can possibly exist
> > > > cannot possibly reach its "return" instruction and every
> > > > C expert knows this.
> > >=20
> > > But that only apply to the PROGRAM DDD built from an HHH that never=
=20
> > > aborts.
> > >=20
> >=20
> > No it does not and every C expert knows that it does not.
> >=20
>=20
> Really> You have a source for that?
>=20
> Or is this just another of your "Digonalization" logic claims that you=
=20
> retracted.
>=20
> Claims that "every x knows" are just a fallacy, and you should know it,=
=20
> but are, of course, just to dumb to understand.
>=20
> Here the problem is you just lie about what "Correctly Emulated" means=
=20
> for determining the behavior of a program.
>=20
> Sorry, you are just proving you are a stupid pathetic ignorant=20
> pathological lying idiot with a reckless disregrad for the truth because=
=20
> you beleive your own lies to the point that you don't even look at the=
=20
> facts.

Don't know why I am glad to see someone finally to find out olcott is a=C2=
=A0
"pathological liar and idiot".

Save all your time. olcott don't understand the basic "if" logic, that says
everything to me. He don't know anything logic.