| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<4avqfjpt3d0nc7j4m084b0t42vscqg788p@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: kids these days Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 18:06:46 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: <4avqfjpt3d0nc7j4m084b0t42vscqg788p@4ax.com> References: <v1rbfj18eqbgr1t9bfvdfqqmn1q91gcfof@4ax.com> <vd5r5k$q48h$1@solani.org> <d56ifj1angpnq16qhhb0vplmlr3tt7opnf@4ax.com> <vdbkap$tc4m$1@solani.org> <kb3jfjpejs47hqjd00fis20eog8de19ae8@4ax.com> <vddc4m$u7hu$1@solani.org> <l6ukfjl7m6q3eiki81t4ln3lr50057obl4@4ax.com> <7bglfjtll1os4g6pfqhf1i7jl0acmrvlqv@4ax.com> <vdehe9$29t3d$1@dont-email.me> <t3qlfjpbmdvfhbqccqp5k22kbf4tcr2r50@4ax.com> <vdjpr1$39i5r$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 19:06:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f2a0a7dcfcf55f6be5273f07d096b032"; logging-data="3488672"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18MkvdlNMUb+C256Joj7eLgUDame9eDr24=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:KjFLnzhIYwi82DL2bpqtticgIm4= Bytes: 2738 On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:45:37 +0100, Clive Arthur <clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote: >On 30/09/2024 19:11, john larkin wrote: ><snip> >> >> If they get the DC part about right, I ask them for any other >> comments. All sorts of things could be mentioned. >> >> With the base looking at 5K, it's unlikley to oscillate. It would be a >> miracle if any kid even mentioned emitter follower oscillation. Or >> noise, or tempcos, or anything else. >> > >Along with a colleague, I interviewed someone for a repair technician's >job a few years back. Among the questions was a simple common emitter >single transistor stage which we asked him to explain. > >He blew us away. He knew *far* more detail than either of us. Turned >out he was a shit-hot analog designer looking for a less stressful job >as he wound down to retirement. He turned out to be brilliant at his >new job, and mentored a lot of younger people. He left when the company >was bought by a large US corporation with the concomitant mind-numbing >treacle-wading bullshit. [Me too!] > >[Among the other questions were to make an Xor using two-input Nands, >show a methodology for calculating a square root where that function >isn't available, and tell us at what temperature solder melts.] You were lucky, then. Designers typically don't make good repair technicians and vice-versa. The two types think in fundamentally different ways.