Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<4avqfjpt3d0nc7j4m084b0t42vscqg788p@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: kids these days
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 18:06:46 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <4avqfjpt3d0nc7j4m084b0t42vscqg788p@4ax.com>
References: <v1rbfj18eqbgr1t9bfvdfqqmn1q91gcfof@4ax.com> <vd5r5k$q48h$1@solani.org> <d56ifj1angpnq16qhhb0vplmlr3tt7opnf@4ax.com> <vdbkap$tc4m$1@solani.org> <kb3jfjpejs47hqjd00fis20eog8de19ae8@4ax.com> <vddc4m$u7hu$1@solani.org> <l6ukfjl7m6q3eiki81t4ln3lr50057obl4@4ax.com> <7bglfjtll1os4g6pfqhf1i7jl0acmrvlqv@4ax.com> <vdehe9$29t3d$1@dont-email.me> <t3qlfjpbmdvfhbqccqp5k22kbf4tcr2r50@4ax.com> <vdjpr1$39i5r$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 19:06:47 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f2a0a7dcfcf55f6be5273f07d096b032";
	logging-data="3488672"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18MkvdlNMUb+C256Joj7eLgUDame9eDr24="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KjFLnzhIYwi82DL2bpqtticgIm4=
Bytes: 2738

On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:45:37 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:

>On 30/09/2024 19:11, john larkin wrote:
><snip>
>> 
>> If they get the DC part about right, I ask them for any other
>> comments. All sorts of things could be mentioned.
>> 
>> With the base looking at 5K, it's unlikley to oscillate. It would be a
>> miracle if any kid even mentioned emitter follower oscillation. Or
>> noise, or tempcos, or anything else.
>> 
>
>Along with a colleague, I interviewed someone for a repair technician's 
>job a few years back.  Among the questions was a simple common emitter 
>single transistor stage which we asked him to explain.
>
>He blew us away.  He knew *far* more detail than either of us.  Turned 
>out he was a shit-hot analog designer looking for a less stressful job 
>as he wound down to retirement.  He turned out to be brilliant at his 
>new job, and mentored a lot of younger people.  He left when the company 
>was bought by a large US corporation with the concomitant mind-numbing 
>treacle-wading bullshit. [Me too!]
>
>[Among the other questions were to make an Xor using two-input Nands, 
>show a methodology for calculating a square root where that function 
>isn't available, and tell us at what temperature solder melts.]

You were lucky, then. Designers typically don't make good repair
technicians and vice-versa. The two types think in fundamentally
different ways.