Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Einstein still sucks, after all these years.
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 01:07:33 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <4b0ee2b8b33c7f434476e1149c48ed3f@www.novabbs.com>
References: <367a05faa8f01479dcdaf8830f10dcf7@www.novabbs.com> <e8b29c5101fbc103960fd726448cb9c5@www.novabbs.com> <14a2a927a6538adba1250e968096d842@www.novabbs.com> <CXFBO.21981$b6j.15432@fx11.ams4> <10fea9950896ac733f4c688b1322dcdb@www.novabbs.com> <vbadl3$3v15v$2@dont-email.me> <17f2245497b85697$828672$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <vbagep$3uuc5$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="890949"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="hWiuCAeR3KEZYJfTvV11n0qrRi6oqW/zjvEZQQGun9A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: f685b96694175b2ad43ead343ead0a9c0082fe88
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$S.hslqbmDk5NZLVHBKchLeU3oW5or1pYtDoIJSgYu52iBkARJbY4O
Bytes: 3416
Lines: 45

"Peers from different times, cultures and countries. So
this likely exclude herd effect. Especially after such
a long time."

And you STILL don't get it, do you?

Read HISTORY OF SCIENCE, please, and re-read my post explaining
developments in physics and chemistry since early 1900.

PEER REVIEW is such a stupid proposal!. It only applies to MEMBERS OF
THE SAME GANG!.

When a Journal call for referees in any give community, to start a PEER
REVIEW process, only those members who ARE ALIGNED to current trends ARE
ALLOWED. No antagonists are allowed, mostly because they have been
CANCELLED in several ways.

 Switch to economy, for instance: Analyzing a given paper is ONLY
ALLOWED by calling experts on THE SAME LINE OF THOUGHT. If you still
have a functioning brain (which I doubt, after checking the SW of your
website), you HAVE TO UNDERSTAND that a peer review using high ranking
economists from different branches, like keynesianians, raw capitalists
and libertarians IS IMPOSSIBLE, because their schools are conflicting in
their credos and postulates (Keynes, Adam Smith, Friedman, Yellen,
Banerjee, Roubini, etc.).

Or take ANY OTHER FIELD, like medical sciences. You can't succeed by
asking pro and anti-vaccination top professionals opining on the same
matter. Or in technology: you CAN'T ASK for big shots from Intel, AMD
and nVidia to opinate about the future of 100 billion transistors chips.

It's not that you have a dogma or follow a cult, Phyton. The problem is
that you are the ultimate retarded, who find IMPOSSIBLE to think about
different lines of thought besides relativism.

That's what fanatic indoctrinated people, with a fossilized brain, do.
Not different from any die hard fan of any team in sports. People like
you, the vast majority, chose the easiest path: TO BELONG TO THE HERD,
AND FOLLOW NON-WRITTEN RULES. You don't think within a herd, you just
follow the stream and are happy with it.

For me, you and many others here are brain-dead. Only one program to
execute working in your head.

But it's your life, even when you wasted it by forbidding yourself to
think freely, without dogmas.