Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Yet another contribution to the P-NP question
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:59:56 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <4b415dd5a91ac648bee8224fc3c28aa19706e06f.camel@gmail.com>
References: <85955d539da522cf777ab489101c0e2a@www.rocksolidbbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:59:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a1ad7d0711421164dcb8426e192c0429";
	logging-data="135505"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+xNkIFBVBGpABkfF3i9ZtJ"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0R/kkenNREqGyMNoobeJqo1iDms=
In-Reply-To: <85955d539da522cf777ab489101c0e2a@www.rocksolidbbs.com>
Bytes: 3074

On Thu, 2024-09-26 at 00:04 +0000, nnymous109 wrote:
> I know the reputation that claims like these get, so I promise, I didn't
> want to do this. But I've spent quite some time working on this document
> that I feel it would be a shame if I didn't, at least, get it
> criticized.
>=20
> As you can probably tell, I have little formal education in Math or
> Computer Science (though I would really like some), so I am not very
> confident in the argument I have come up with. I also haven't been able
> to get someone else to review the work and give feedback, so there might
> be obvious flaws that=C2=A0=C2=A0 I have not picked up on because they ha=
ve
> remained in my blind spots.
>=20
> In the best case, this may still be work in progress, so I will be
> thankful for any comments you will have for me. However, in the more
> than likely scenario that the argument is fundamentally flawed and
> cannot be rescued, I apologize beforehand for having wasted your time.
>=20
> I have placed the document in a Figshare project, and here is the DOI:
> 10.6084/m9.figshare.27106759

I can't get the copy, can't say too much.
=20
This is my proof that P!=3DNP (in Chinese)
https://sourceforge.net/projects/cscall/files/MisFiles/PNP-proof-zh.txt/dow=
nload
The English version is not updated (but the basic idea is the same)
https://sourceforge.net/projects/cscall/files/MisFiles/PNP-proof-en.txt/dow=
nload

I think my proof have presentation problems as a formal proof, but the goal=
 is
for myself only, so not a real problem for me (P-NP problem is very tricky =
to =20
prove, mightbe worse than the "0.999...=3D=3D1" false belief).

By the way, "repeating decimal is irrational" (because, in short, statement
"=E2=84=9A+=E2=84=9A=3D=E2=84=9A" only valid in finite steps of application=
.. ... Contemporary axiomatic=20
system has a serious problem, ALL EXISTING PROOFS or knowledge should be re=
-examined).