Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: do you believe we can quantize =?UTF-8?B?Z3Jhdml0eT8=?=
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 23:02:13 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <4c50b076e7a95dce2a6cc4d7809bd316@www.novabbs.com>
References: <j9oiptyjxgxi$.dlg@tomato.potato> <678b32e2a0eba553fdcf24b9489cc5d5@www.novabbs.com> <aflttk-b2682.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <06a143affa77a528480f8fb55f650787@www.novabbs.com> <o0gvtk-5gba2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <171469a06dcc0b480244123ef80cb6c7@www.novabbs.com> <76c0uk-4rvb2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <3eeda91637960d56227668bb451ce488@www.novabbs.com> <lqo0uk-7efc2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <fca3349b925fcdfa219cd74e9ef20b9d@www.novabbs.com> <og92uk-gsde2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2358542"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$yYUJ8rX6yB9s6fohFjx7Kep9WdLUIlSDVeFkH2xX0uNrZKvN7ej0S
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:06:50 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 0:15:51 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:40:09 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:39:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:00:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip old crap>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Having watched your videos I have to ask, what is it that you think is
>>>>>>>>> new in YOUR railgun in one sentence? Where is your math that shows it is
>>>>>>>>> anything new?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Heavy armature, very low voltage, very light weight.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing new there whatsoever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keep on lying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is a new design
>>>>>>>> rail gun which proved Arindam's thesis that it has no reaction by easily
>>>>>>>> reproducible experiment. Which is the greatest science discovery of our
>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yet you have no details, no instrumentation, no data and no analysis
>>>>>>> with error bars that prove anything.  Just crackpot ravings.
>>
>> Arindam has presented the most powerful proofs using video evidence,
>> lying fool.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keep on lying. What better to expect from racist bigots!
>>>>>
>>>>> Does your railgun have two parallel conductors connected to a DC power
>>>>> source?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, nothing new there.
>>
>> The DC source is only 12 volts. Show another rail gun which accelerates
>> a 4000gm bullet and weighs 8 Kg.
>>
>> The weight of bullet to weight of gun including power supply is a few
>> orders of magnitude less than normal guns let alone rail guns.
>>
>> That ratio is new.
>
> To claim anything new, you have to show that your railgun does not
> follow the well known equations for railguns, crackpot.

No reason for Arindam to educate fools and scoundrels.
His invention works unlike what was said to deprive him of his PhD.
It is evident to anyone with the faintest intelligence that Arindam had
conceived, designed, constructed and tested a new design of rail gun
with low weight, low voltage, and heavy armature.
As a most honest scientist Arindam had provided all the details involved
in his videos and Usenet and Facebook postings. Yes they are scattered
all over. At the right time they will get integrated as appropriate.
Arindam does this work for his company, HTN Research, which generates IP
in the fields of energy and motion.
That will be a holding company for others using the IP Arindam
generated, all going well.

Woof-woof

Bertietaylor




>
> Since you have no data, no analysis and no error bars, you have nothing
> crackpot.
>
>>>>>
>>>>> Does your railgun have a conductive armateur across the rails?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, nothing new there.
>>
>> New thing is the huge heaviness of the armature or bullet with respect
>> to the gun and its showing how it moves over the rails on a frame by
>> frame basis.
>
> A railgun is a direct current homopolar linear motor designed for high
> acceleration and thus high velocity.
>
>> Penisnino, show the video of ANY gun where the movement of the bullet
>> within the barrel or on rails is videoed on a frame by frame basis.
>
> Since your "railgun" operates at low acceleration and low velocity, it
> is not a railgun by definition and nothing more than a low speed linear
> motor.
>
> <snip>