Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on =?UTF-8?B?bT1FL2NeMg==?=
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:14:33 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <4c93e3730da23d52d7ae76b82315ac23@www.novabbs.com>
References: <b63aec6ac23c5f03f785a3b342122e74@www.novabbs.com> <ebb75c2571da5e06aef09861c2e2c6a1@www.novabbs.com> <6856ad6ee17097c4e1580e4f40c13043@www.novabbs.com> <vq6vc8$1ssfk$1@dont-email.me> <2e0a65293b1b9ab4c1510495f33ca7b5@www.novabbs.com> <vq9luv$2epgi$1@dont-email.me> <d92589ac131ee55c5fced0b12efb47b6@www.novabbs.com> <vqbmnf$2tbfk$1@dont-email.me> <a63f5ae63b8df78f44f6497220b17eeb@www.novabbs.com> <67cac50f$0$16841$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3297428"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$vAQQhpatvXIOFEB/c2q6QuJJv7GptS0El1Wi3GRTRUMWj4a9vbNEG

On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:06:06 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

> rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 8:38:47 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Den 05.03.2025 19:11, skrev rhertz:
>>>>
>>>> I question your assertion that E = mc? work both ways (mc? = E). This IS
>>>> NOT AN EQUATION! This is a 1-way expression, which doesn't work
>>>> reversing terms positions.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production
>>>
>>> ? ? e? + e?
>>
>> I asked you not to come with the particle physics shit.
>
> Too difficult for you?
>
>> Tell me about MATTER created by energy anywhere, in scales above the
>> mysterious quantum world (of which, BTW, nobody knows shit even after
>> 100 years).
>
> At CERN, among other places.
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antihydrogen>
> Thousands of anti-atoms, so far, created from (lots of!) energy.
> Matter, mind you, stationary, in a trap,
> not just charged particles flying by.
>
>> Do you have one example of 1 gramm of MATTER created by energy? (The
>> reverse case of the stupid end in the 1905 Einstein's paper).
>
> You are just being silly here. One gram equals 10^14 Joule,
> which is the output of a gigawatt power plant for a whole day.
> Given the extremely low conversion efficiencies,
> the creation of one gram of anti-hydrogen would use up more energy
> than all of humanity taken together can generate.
>
> Jan

Imbecile Jan: for the macroworld, I propose two 1-Ways equations to
replace
the crap of E=mc^2. Apply them to nuclear reactors or some shit of equal
size:


E = 0.6 mc^2  (valid for m > 1,000 Kg)

m = 0.0000000000000000001 E/c^2   (valid for E > 10^18 Joules).


Science should do get it a try.