Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<4d440297d7e17251ebc50774bacfec73e184f9bc@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.network!news.neodome.net!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dxf <dxforth@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Parsing timestamps?
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 12:25:08 +1000
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <4d440297d7e17251ebc50774bacfec73e184f9bc@i2pn2.org>
References: <1f433fabcb4d053d16cbc098dedc6c370608ac01@i2pn2.org>
 <2025Jul2.172222@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <nnd$77366e3c$215e3e20@1580fe9081551b96>
 <300ba9a1581bea9a01ab85d5d361e6eaeedbf23a@i2pn2.org>
 <nnd$619ca290$2bff25f3@fa4b7a265c28888c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 02:25:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3415417"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="XPw7UV90Iy7EOhY4YuUXhpdoEf5Vz7K+BsxA/Cx8bVc";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <nnd$619ca290$2bff25f3@fa4b7a265c28888c>
Content-Language: en-GB

On 4/07/2025 8:01 pm, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
> In article <300ba9a1581bea9a01ab85d5d361e6eaeedbf23a@i2pn2.org>,
> dxf  <dxforth@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/07/2025 10:51 pm, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I like to remind of the youtube FORTH2020 of Wagner. This concerns
>>> motions of aircraft, position speed, pitch roll and yaw etc.
>>> Terribly complicated, no LOCAL's. There was a question whether LOCAL's
>>> could have made Wagners code easier.
>>> He stated the ideal (paraphrased by me) that "code is its own comment"
>>
>> That was an interesting video even if more a rundown of his (long) history
>> as a professional forth programmer.  Here's the link for anyone curious:
>>
>> https://youtu.be/V9ES9UZHaag
>>
>> He said he uses the hardware fp stack for speed.  Is he really only
>> using 8 levels of stack?
> 
> 8 level is plenty as long as you refrain from recursion that in
> Wagners context would be not even remotely useful.

Puzzling because of a thread here not long ago in which scientific users
appear to suggest the opposite.  Such concerns have apparently been around
a long time:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.forth/c/CApt6AiFkxo/m/wwZmc_Tr1PcJ