| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<4d440297d7e17251ebc50774bacfec73e184f9bc@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.network!news.neodome.net!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Parsing timestamps? Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 12:25:08 +1000 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <4d440297d7e17251ebc50774bacfec73e184f9bc@i2pn2.org> References: <1f433fabcb4d053d16cbc098dedc6c370608ac01@i2pn2.org> <2025Jul2.172222@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <nnd$77366e3c$215e3e20@1580fe9081551b96> <300ba9a1581bea9a01ab85d5d361e6eaeedbf23a@i2pn2.org> <nnd$619ca290$2bff25f3@fa4b7a265c28888c> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 02:25:10 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3415417"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="XPw7UV90Iy7EOhY4YuUXhpdoEf5Vz7K+BsxA/Cx8bVc"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <nnd$619ca290$2bff25f3@fa4b7a265c28888c> Content-Language: en-GB On 4/07/2025 8:01 pm, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote: > In article <300ba9a1581bea9a01ab85d5d361e6eaeedbf23a@i2pn2.org>, > dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 3/07/2025 10:51 pm, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote: >>> ... >>> I like to remind of the youtube FORTH2020 of Wagner. This concerns >>> motions of aircraft, position speed, pitch roll and yaw etc. >>> Terribly complicated, no LOCAL's. There was a question whether LOCAL's >>> could have made Wagners code easier. >>> He stated the ideal (paraphrased by me) that "code is its own comment" >> >> That was an interesting video even if more a rundown of his (long) history >> as a professional forth programmer. Here's the link for anyone curious: >> >> https://youtu.be/V9ES9UZHaag >> >> He said he uses the hardware fp stack for speed. Is he really only >> using 8 levels of stack? > > 8 level is plenty as long as you refrain from recursion that in > Wagners context would be not even remotely useful. Puzzling because of a thread here not long ago in which scientific users appear to suggest the opposite. Such concerns have apparently been around a long time: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.forth/c/CApt6AiFkxo/m/wwZmc_Tr1PcJ