Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 15:23:47 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <4ee27843d6adcd5df696f89c248c0b89@www.novabbs.com>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <1b0910c819bb031839b21557a19c75be@www.novabbs.com> <_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp> <1f081cbe82f7c86f1463b0bf5ad957a9@www.novabbs.com> <9mrYetkghLXwIcwZUl4c8b3LTKI@jntp> <f21b77862f36ab6a27fd237fda9661f8@www.novabbs.com> <Rsj9fwaYx7xWTx_LjgnuDLRLG0M@jntp> <6f498e8663ec0b05b9cd9e03df9b4de4@www.novabbs.com> <tWsKauuW6XViPa1OVHe8GAFt0pY@jntp> <0cb92f486425b83cdc71dbdea3093427@www.novabbs.com> <2EXLnr_H9bJJ03uqOqvAke2Stu0@jntp> <40a7f3651fa003ba04b12ddd79ee55b1@www.novabbs.com> <lfp8pbFkr1mU1@mid.individual.net> <277d12ea32119cb16056773223fe1a45@www.novabbs.com> <17e2ff3657424607$138252$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <8c5cae32d7b5302644e335db90064dec@www.novabbs.com> <17e31d9f0ea34274$12530$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <51eba63d8a08b89d410efc51b6b60e25@www.novabbs.com> <17e331ac24d2ad36$81191$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="998685"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$C9sk5UEg4zrnyIFa68GmuOZ9ezJJVrbUTuXNVX00xplHE4/UzOEXy
Bytes: 2755
Lines: 26

On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 3:41:39 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 18.07.2024 o 04:10, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 21:34:12 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > W dniu 17.07.2024 o 22:26, gharnagel pisze:
> > > >
> > > > Wozzie is lying again.  The speed of light is locally
> > > > equal to c.
> > >
> > > Well, Harrie, do you see any difference between
> > > the claim "speed of light is always equal to
> > > c" and the claim "speed of light is  always  locally
> > > equal to c"?
> >
> > Yes, I do.  Wozzie-liar is the one who can't.  He
> > thinks that science once stated can't change.
>
> Do I? Didn't I explain you and your fellow idiots
> that even your idiot guru was unable to stick to
> his "costant speed of light" absurd for a long time
> and his GR shit had to abandon it?

And Wozzie-dunce is shouting that Saint Ike was somehow
an idiot for doing that.  Seems Wozzie can't even think
rationally.  Wozzie defecates on himself again.