Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions? (infinitary)
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:53:53 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <4f074c417231f5740dcd137ecf2f9ded0a5c8b86@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vdua6f$18vqi$2@dont-email.me>
	<vdubg3$24me$1@news.muc.de> <4bc3b086-247a-4547-89cc-1d47f502659d@tha.de>
	<ve0n4i$1vps$1@news.muc.de> <ve10qb$1p7ge$1@dont-email.me>
	<ve117p$vob$1@news.muc.de> <ve315q$24f8f$3@dont-email.me>
	<ve46vu$324$2@news.muc.de> <ve5u2i$2jobg$4@dont-email.me>
	<ve6329$19d5$1@news.muc.de> <ve64kl$2m0nm$4@dont-email.me>
	<ve66f3$19d5$2@news.muc.de> <ve683o$6c2o$1@solani.org>
	<ve6a23$19d5$3@news.muc.de> <ve6c3b$6esq$2@solani.org>
	<ve6kl1$207d$1@news.muc.de> <ve96jj$38qui$2@dont-email.me>
	<57bac4ef6ac73be7cfd418e24d896d09d407720c@i2pn2.org>
	<vea5f8$3gcbh$1@dont-email.me>
	<785289fa9737462db1d2a73b9018779f561eaa8c@i2pn2.org>
	<3a377d5f-7dd3-4caa-aa7a-5c76bb70966e@att.net> <veefog$97l4$1@dont-email.me>
	<07d13bc52b7dce927aa7f63df631d1cd4d4ed5a7@i2pn2.org>
	<veis6b$desj$5@solani.org>
	<201b2d297fbdecd4b12236ccd456000754894476@i2pn2.org>
	<vej6m2$dm1f$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:53:53 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1993196"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2419
Lines: 13

Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:34:59 +0200 schrieb WM:
> On 14.10.2024 14:00, joes wrote:
>> Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:35:56 +0200 schrieb WM:
> 
>>> False. n*2 > n for all numbers, even for infinite numbers.
>> Of course, and if the infinity is actual, they must already be in
>> there.
> They cannot be there because doubling all elements of a set of naturals
> doubles the space covered on the number line.
It does not. Changing the elements does not change their number.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.