| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<5000d20ac2ceb3045333d5815185d7e9fa06a433@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 15:17:51 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <5000d20ac2ceb3045333d5815185d7e9fa06a433@i2pn2.org> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <val92g$33pkn$1@dont-email.me> <val9hk$33mgs$1@dont-email.me> <GknMvtkLnWBwOVHuwhpOvuPVwIg@jntp> <5d289c3ad609a69bad184ed6c95fbedc401f0189@i2pn2.org> <CL-CpLVceqNZ5MK6wf1XbuKQEo4@jntp> <3fafe57018c41eaa478c6ada3df62f4d0a00d51e@i2pn2.org> <OXlvm-eK1v5HrCZkGbHkq1lHzY8@jntp> <6cc116c789d9655c5142f02ae570f87d38f6a578@i2pn2.org> <vas606$epel$1@dont-email.me> <LsZJcLTh_0Tan0JmhRtRomPoNYw@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 15:17:51 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="260275"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2145 Lines: 19 Am Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:59:47 +0000 schrieb WM: > Le 30/08/2024 à 12:13, Moebius a écrit : >> Am 30.08.2024 um 09:21 schrieb joes: > >>> Thus: The interval (0, x) contains finitely many unit fractions only >>> for infinitesimal x. >> Actually, it either contains NO unit fractions (if x = 0 or x is >> infinitesimal but > 0) or it contains infinitely many (ℵo) unit >> fractions. > That contradicts the fact that ℵo unit fractions occupy an interval that > can be reduced. What do you mean by „reducing”? That the number of unit fractions stays infinite when cutting off the right? >> So no matter if x > 0 is infinitesimal or not: NUF(x) =/= 1. > Are there two unit fractions possible lessorequal than all unit > fractions? -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.