Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 20:05:33 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <509ee3cdf4e3f46de144f88c115fce2b@www.novabbs.com>
References: <db18709b6ba689b9c07245000ff1b094@www.novabbs.com> <53a754e33f8216df2e7882aa63ee8391@www.novabbs.com> <511c68d28f959e6fc1f6e64452fd415d@www.novabbs.com> <6718b186$0$532$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <be287e10cd90f0cbfd70c711873fcea4@www.novabbs.com> <2cbcea74010d65879416d2d1aed4a84b@www.novabbs.com> <ab86444ec806e48f140fd4f40ae3d7f1@www.novabbs.com> <a565a043054152d727f9dbbdd131cddd@www.novabbs.com> <b16549f31a5f9627f2b4a922ea11f872@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3651622"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="Ooch2ht+q3xfrepY75FKkEEx2SPWDQTvfft66HacveI";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 504a4e36a1e6a0679da537f565a179f60d7acbd8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$I5LcE0Hq1YqbwDbke0s1ze5IQndq1MdqDZQK.aX/.6Gcp79oxU2eG
Bytes: 2548
Lines: 22

On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:29:26 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

> Prok: Thank you for the textbook explanation. It's hard to know where to
> start, considering that relativity is full of fallacies. Time is an
> abstraction, so for it to curve involves the reification fallacy, which
> is nonsense. Time does not curve. Space is an abstraction, so curved
> space also consists of the reification fallacy, making it nonsense. It
> is pathetic that university's (prestige mills) teach what is prestigious
> when it is nonsense.
>
> Granted that relativity explains Newtonian gravity by curved time and
> adds to that relativity gravity caused by curved space. Unfortunately,
> neither alleged cause explains anything because they are illogical
> nonsense.

It is evident that you do not know enough about the subject to give
any sort of valid critique. There are indeed issues with general
relativity, and I, having studied the subject as an autodidact for
several years, consider myself *barely* capable of explaining the
nature of these issues.

You, however, have repeatedly proven yourself in no position to
contribute any useful ideas to the debate.