Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<50d67245623f6116d399ab3a0a503fa7@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics Subject: Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious =?UTF-8?B?QmF1Ymxlcz8=?= Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 22:11:03 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <50d67245623f6116d399ab3a0a503fa7@www.novabbs.com> References: <266e4dcf4bee1d0100c5716c04f2e786@www.novabbs.com> <679284FD.3ABB@ix.netcom.com> <67a111c1cd4ba39ca41fe660200ecadf@www.novabbs.com> <5e7fc5f52bd5693fabce0060ee8b91df@www.novabbs.com> <vmufi5$1r9fi$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="986159"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$venAT14qvF/VGs7uT/jK/egdwMLSNNuKjEA3vexSZeUNkxtjb4CxC X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180 Bytes: 3531 Lines: 52 On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 22:24:04 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 1/23/2025 2:20 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 21:47:25 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. >>>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain >>>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The >>>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a >>>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing >>>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as >>>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and >>>>> thoughtlessly >>>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, >>>>> slavish, and avoidable. >>>> >>>> >>>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks >>>> monopoly'. >>>> >>>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) >>>> >>>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. >>>> >>>> >>>> The cabal decides what they want you to think. >>>> >>>> >>>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> The really amusing thing is that people are intellectual weaklings who >>> couldn't reason themselves out of a paper bag, or they wouldn't accept >>> curved space for a second. >> Did you ever acknowledge my point that Einstein should have understood >> that parallel lines would have to meet for space to curve? Isn't it >> stupid as hell not to recognize that? If he had been an honest and >> forthright person, he would have said we have to presume that parallel >> lines meet to claim space is curved, and this is our derivation for the >> doubling of the Newtonian deflection. Then, every reasonable person >> would have balked at such an irrational assumption and recognized him as >> a foolish fellow. > > Think of drawing two horizontal lines on a spheres surface. They will > never intersect. You presume space can be treated as a surface. That is a petitio principii. You presume it's curved to conclude it's curved. It's not a surface and its not curved.