Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis ---x86 code is a liar?
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:50:59 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <5106d09605e39d9f0cbd309f7a7a2b1b3607fd80@i2pn2.org>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vghb16$2ge1v$1@dont-email.me>
 <e51f21daadd358ef13801c918106c2fdc65a9f6b@i2pn2.org>
 <vghe3p$2gr3p$1@dont-email.me>
 <4cb98b3918d6745f53bb19582b59e786d4af5022@i2pn2.org>
 <vghgar$2h30o$1@dont-email.me>
 <e40629600e317dba47dd3d066d83899fa7b8a7ab@i2pn2.org>
 <vgiq1d$2nkqv$1@dont-email.me>
 <e84328012ce8d1e75b9b569f15f74fde315a0548@i2pn2.org>
 <vgjd2f$2qdc5$1@dont-email.me>
 <4654d9db2fa0906d7ab7a1c6c09139ab0b0110cd@i2pn2.org>
 <vgl7vl$37h38$4@dont-email.me> <vgnph1$3qcpl$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgns0o$3qq7s$1@dont-email.me> <vgsnod$upmp$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgt61q$11e5a$3@dont-email.me>
 <4eebe767dc236a7770566fc1593aae14a38cb085@i2pn2.org>
 <vgtbpd$12ji4$1@dont-email.me>
 <49bbc7f6ba667da66bc56c69db049774c066d084@i2pn2.org>
 <vgvmtb$1kbe2$1@dont-email.me> <vh20o5$25r1d$1@dont-email.me>
 <vh3bn2$2e37l$6@dont-email.me> <vh4env$2o2ht$1@dont-email.me>
 <vh62i2$32617$4@dont-email.me> <vh73mm$3bep5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vh8ma6$3l333$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:50:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2658020"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vh8ma6$3l333$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4419
Lines: 63

On 11/15/24 6:43 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 11/15/2024 3:19 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-11-14 23:53:38 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 11/14/2024 3:09 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-11-13 23:11:30 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/13/2024 4:58 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-11-12 13:58:03 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/12/2024 1:12 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:35:57 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>> On 11/11/2024 10:25 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Am Mon, 11 Nov 2024 08:58:02 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/11/2024 4:54 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-11-09 14:36:07 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/9/2024 7:53 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The actual computation itself does involve HHH emulating itself
>>>>>>>>>>> emulating DDD. To simply pretend that this does not occur seems
>>>>>>>>>>> dishonest.
>>>>>>>>>> Which is what you are doing: you pretend that DDD calls some 
>>>>>>>>>> other HHH
>>>>>>>>>> that doesn’t abort.
>>>>>>>>> DDD emulated by HHH does not reach its "return" instruction 
>>>>>>>>> final halt
>>>>>>>>> state whether HHH aborts its emulation or not.
>>>>>>>> When DDD calls a simulator that aborts, that simulator returns 
>>>>>>>> to DDD,
>>>>>>>> which then halts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is not the same DDD as the DDD under test.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the DDD under the test is not the same as DDD then the test
>>>>>> is performed incorrectly and the test result is not valid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The DDD under test IS THE INPUT DDD
>>>>> IT IS STUPIDLY WRONG-HEADED TO THINK OTHERWISE.
>>>>
>>>> I agree that there is only one DDD but above you said otherwise.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is a ridiculously stupid thing to say because we
>>> already know that DDD emulated by HHH emulates itself
>>> emulating DDD and DDD emulated by HHH1 *DOES NOT DO THAT*
>>
>> You are free to laugh if you think the truth is stupid.
>>
> 
> This is my life's only legacy that I really want to complete
> before I die.
> 

Then you better get working on building the foundation you need rather 
than just lying about using that which hasn't been created.

Of course, my guess is you will need a number of years of study to learn 
the basics you need to even be able to start this, so my guess is you 
have wasted too much time with your lies and have just failed to leave 
the legacy you wanted, but instead are leaving the legacy of your 
incompetence.