Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: DeepBlue <dan.koren@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Subject: Re: What is the reason for this piano duo =?UTF-8?B?bGF5b3V0Pw==?=
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 22:36:09 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <511edf70b86750c2cc68be643cfd329b@www.novabbs.com>
References: <71a12235f2ee60320795199f621572e8@www.novabbs.com> <vst7ld$334o4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <2581c86a278b6d5e6d13a16515c445fc@www.novabbs.com> <vsu9cb$34piu$1@paganini.bofh.team>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3436275"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="+LX6U+QEdxmX65G/ioNLHVfhXMvuBu5fNOpF5omT0G8";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$i1Uxh2/ZEO9Sgxj12a4wG.a5E0LtD/Ssf8qgzf9rZrk2ks.JyO4mO
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 9e00570fb1895deee7851c86c763dbf872b2557c

On Sun, 6 Apr 2025 16:16:10 +0000, PPeso wrote:

> On 4/6/2025 4:45 AM, DeepBlue wrote:
>> One does not have to be a strict literalist. I
>> actually prefer D.940 to be performend on 2
>> pianos rather than 4 hands on one piano.
>
> No literalism involved. Schubert never wrote for
> two pianos, always for 4 hands, and quite simply
> he knew better.

How is this not "strict literalism", and how did he
know "better"? Today's instruments are nothing like
the pianoforti and the fortepiani of his time. Could
any compawsers living in those times have imagined
the sound of a 9' Boisendorfer, Fazioli, or Yamaha?

Concert venues were also much smaller than today's.

> At the very least, the biggest difference is obviously
> the approach to pedaling, centralized with 4 hands and
> decentralized with two pianos.

I very much prefer to hear different sound, different
color palettes, and different expression and phrasing
from the two pianists rather than a homogenuous sound
mix. To my ears the latter is more bland. Here is an
exampla:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_J2WyyF_t2I

This is a blandissimo as blandissimo can be. In piano
duets I like to hear two distinct individuals rather
than a four handed pianist. The link I posted earlier
to a Martha Argerich + Mikhail Pletnev live perfornabce
is a perfect example of what I like in this work:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BH3EjKOqSmA

By comparison the Jussen brothers sound like a sewing
machine. They cannot even make it sound like two sewing
machines! ;-)

> Then again, no worries if one prefers a transcription
> to the real thing.

How again is this not "strict literalism"? A performance
of a 4 hand piano work on 2 pianos is not a transcription
unless the score has been modified. If one followed your
reasoning to its logical conclusion performing the work
on any instrumenti that are however different from Franz'
spinet would create a "transcription".

> Today is national carbonara day and many restaurants
> make it with pancetta rather than guanciale, far from
> optimal but de gustibus non disputandum est.

Except this is not kosher and there is no room for debate!

Cheers!