Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 02:10:58 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <51eba63d8a08b89d410efc51b6b60e25@www.novabbs.com>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <1b0910c819bb031839b21557a19c75be@www.novabbs.com> <_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp> <1f081cbe82f7c86f1463b0bf5ad957a9@www.novabbs.com> <9mrYetkghLXwIcwZUl4c8b3LTKI@jntp> <f21b77862f36ab6a27fd237fda9661f8@www.novabbs.com> <Rsj9fwaYx7xWTx_LjgnuDLRLG0M@jntp> <6f498e8663ec0b05b9cd9e03df9b4de4@www.novabbs.com> <tWsKauuW6XViPa1OVHe8GAFt0pY@jntp> <0cb92f486425b83cdc71dbdea3093427@www.novabbs.com> <2EXLnr_H9bJJ03uqOqvAke2Stu0@jntp> <40a7f3651fa003ba04b12ddd79ee55b1@www.novabbs.com> <lfp8pbFkr1mU1@mid.individual.net> <277d12ea32119cb16056773223fe1a45@www.novabbs.com> <17e2ff3657424607$138252$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <8c5cae32d7b5302644e335db90064dec@www.novabbs.com> <17e31d9f0ea34274$12530$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3661217"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$YkyhUn1VzZfbnJV9eEzs9.KL.vY8dtpGKTyK6u.C6kKaX.NSFWmLu
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2678
Lines: 26

On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 21:34:12 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 17.07.2024 o 22:26, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > Wozzie is lying again.  The speed of light is locally
> > equal to c.
>
> Well, Harrie, do you see any difference between
> the claim "speed of light is always equal to
> c" and the claim "speed of light is  always  locally
> equal to c"?

Yes, I do.  Wozzie-liar is the one who can't.  He
thinks that science once stated can't change.  He is
more akin to a Medieval Pope than a 19th century
thinker (which is all the farther his intellect (or
lack thereof) can take him.

> I think you do see some difference. You're an idiot,
> sure, but you're not THAT stupid. You're just a
> piece of fanatic, lying piece of shit instead.

Dishonest Wozzie-fool is projecting his own self-defecation
on others.  Unfortunately, this self-styled disinformation
engineer really IS so stupid that he defecates on himself
instead of in his outhouse, which is right beside the rock
he lives under.