Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<52d8d45d0db77680236c09bb395148d8803f7f17.camel@gmail.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Proof2: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=84=99=E2=89=A0=E2=84=95=E2=84=99?= is released Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:58:36 +0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 34 Message-ID: <52d8d45d0db77680236c09bb395148d8803f7f17.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:58:37 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ce5e8c882daf6be7d69ac6d35bd5687f"; logging-data="2474143"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/7oI05rAY/bHmj8WpgZF3j" User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41) Cancel-Lock: sha1:juI38ACR4Jkeh+sSLa1AO4MGuRE= Bytes: 2352 This =E2=84=99=E2=89=A0=E2=84=95=E2=84=99 proof is the shortest one and eas= y to understand https://sourceforge.net/projects/cscall/files/MisFiles/PNP-proof-en.txt/dow= nload .... +--------------+ | Proof2: =E2=84=99=E2=89=A0=E2=84=95=E2=84=99 | +--------------+ STM::=3D Turing machine represented by string {0,1}* string Num(x)::=3D Function that maps {0,1}* to natural numbers Let s=E2=88=88STM, s:STM->{0,1}. s is a function that computes a Turing ma= chine decision function in Ptime and is defined as follows: s(f)=3D1 if =E2=88=83c=E2=88=88<=3DNum(f), f(c)=3D1. Therefore, Problem(s)=E2=88=88=E2=84=95=E2=84=99 (the problem solved by s = is =E2=84=95=E2=84=99 problem) The proof of this assertion is quite straightforward and trivial, so it is omitted. Doubts about whether certain natural numbers are legal Turing Machines are not a problem, because the definition of =E2=84=95=E2=84=99 d= oes not consider (and can handle) this situation. Assume that Problem(s)=E2=88=88=E2=84=99 holds, then by definition s(s)=3D1 if =E2=88=83c=E2=88=88<=3DNum(s), s(c)=3D1. But when c=3DNum(s), there will be a self-referential situation where s(s)=3D1 if s(s)=3D1 (similar to the undecidable situation of the haltin= g problem). Therefore, the assumption that =E2=84=99=3D=E2=84=95=E2=84=99 do= es not hold, that is, =E2=84=99=E2=89=A0=E2=84=95=E2=84=99.