| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<538f909e3291711d4e4d4b6402442cea@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: George J. Dance@novabbs.com (George J. Dance) Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems Subject: Re: NastyGoon lifts a line Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 13:21:49 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <538f909e3291711d4e4d4b6402442cea@www.novabbs.com> References: <c120480a19034181aef31ea4a03df8d8@www.novabbs.com> <d1c8891cc6b9605e75d4649d8ddc7101@www.novabbs.com> <f752753f8faa6b5c018f6a6e6dc39126@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="6420"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="8+dz2rsm3jrbG2zIijE9ZpD7dtD/aCelSs77CawmFcg"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: da88b0d4e721c88c814af4f3bade12e63975cfc7 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Svg9qcBB42mu/XEvwGpkgeYzGvEBQRBqDTWW.FXH2/Gda6tKbt4fi X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2986 Lines: 46 On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 19:07:23 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain aka "HarryLime" wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:28:45 +0000, W.Dockery wrote: >> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 0:04:15 +0000, George J. Dance wrote: >>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:15:27 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain (MPP) aka >>> "HarryLime" wrote: >>> >>>> Here are the opening lines of NancyGene's latest poem: >>>> >>>> "Yesterdays stack up like piles of read newspapers, >>>> Cluttering my mind and obstructing my day." >>>> >>>> That's poetry of the highest quality. >>> >>> The opening line is very good. It's almost as good as the opening line >>> of Robert Creeleys poem, "The Days Pile Up": >>> >>> "The days pile up like unread newspapers," >>> >>> I do hope "Dr." NastyGoon credited Mr. Creeley; otherwise that would be >>> something they would call, you know -- "plagiarism". >> >> Note that George Dance didn't make any accusations, only an observation. > > Wrong, Donkey. No, HarryLiar; he's right. There was no accusation of plagiarism, just an observation: if NastyGoon had found such a line in a poem they'd have called it plagiarism. The story that I accused her must have been come from you. > George clearly specified that his "observation" was contingent upon > whether NancyGene credited Creeley for her poem -- which he knows full > well that she did not. And I'll stand by my observation, which seems quite clear to me on rereading: if NastyGoon had found a similar line in another person's poem, uncredited, they'd have called it plagiarism. > He knows this because I presented the opening > lines of her poem as being an example of *her* talent as a poet. Had > the lines been cribbed from Mr. Creeley, my example would not have > applied. The fact you were slurping your "colleague" is irrelevant. For all I know from what you provided, it's a cento with notes at the bottom crediting the sources.