Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <54a0686c6805dbc7ce10973021847408@www.novabbs.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<54a0686c6805dbc7ce10973021847408@www.novabbs.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Privilege Levels Below User
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 21:20:45 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <54a0686c6805dbc7ce10973021847408@www.novabbs.org>
References: <jai66jd4ih4ejmek0abnl4gvg5td4obsqg@4ax.com> <h0ib6j576v8o37qu1ojrsmeb5o88f29upe@4ax.com> <2024Jun9.185245@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <38ob6jl9sl3ceb0qugaf26cbv8lk7hmdil@4ax.com> <2024Jun10.091648@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <o32f6jlq2qpi9s1u8giq521vv40uqrkiod@4ax.com> <lcq749F7sotU1@mid.individual.net> <9b9h6jtuengblsscovsh7qc652lmao4vt8@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3900611"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$GirgbMK1yIymAgyZOzief.isyvXgykbosrTEd5CzECMjGvzemsLH2
Bytes: 2039
Lines: 20

John Savard wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:54:16 +0300, Niklas Holsti
> <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> wrote:

>>Not always. If the mistakenly speculated cache-fetch /evicted/ some 
>>other data from the (finite-sized) cache, and the evicted data are 
>>needed later on the /true/ execution path, the mistakenly speculated 
>>fetch has a /negative/ effect on performance. (This kind of "timing 
>>anomaly" is very bothersome in static WCET analysis.)

That is why you don't update the cache until the causing instruction 
retires.

> Ouch. Another argument for having a victim cache. And a benefit of
> doing it in what is apparently Mitch Alsup's way - holding off cache
> updates until instruction retirement.

Change your thought from victim cache to pipeline buffer pre cache.

> John Savard