Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <554bd957ea65660a8e6415ca6a48c08c@www.novabbs.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<554bd957ea65660a8e6415ca6a48c08c@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 23:57:10 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <554bd957ea65660a8e6415ca6a48c08c@www.novabbs.com>
References: <1805cd581e3df873$381521$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1442684"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$m5ouGEiYrQKRiVQhTsRuZe6yVulz/Wf/XgR/wq.GpE6bhiOEokGke
Bytes: 2358
Lines: 39

On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 21:36:50 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> As seen, the definition of second loved so
> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>
>
> Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
> solar system is measuring the length
> of solar day. What is the result predicted
> by the Einsteinian physics?
> One prediction is - 99766. From the
> postulates. The second prediction is -
> 86400. From definition.
> And similiarly with the prediction of
> a measurement of a meridian.
>
>
> Thank you for your attention, poor
> relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.

Cutting and pasting this nonsense indicates
some kind of obsession, perhaps OCD.

Anyway, it is easily refuted.  Place a clock
on earth that can be read by the moving
observer.  It will read 86400 seconds/day,
in complete accordance with the definition.
That the observer's clock will read 99766
seconds is in accord with relativity as well
as experimental measurement of time dilation.

Wozniak is conflating two different things
and confusing as well as being confused by
reality.  Definitions are human inventions,
the nature of the universe (like time, space
and time dilation) isn't.