| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<559d228c01ea290aec13e735ec85036862578165@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 22:02:20 -0500 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <559d228c01ea290aec13e735ec85036862578165@i2pn2.org> References: <vmo1bs$1rnl$1@dont-email.me> <vocig1$15cth$1@dont-email.me> <68bab5c2-50d3-43fc-be0d-51e01c5952bb@att.net> <vof5e4$1n7gr$1@dont-email.me> <a52c053a-8537-4f77-849d-aba3cf51283f@att.net> <vog83h$1rvmp$4@dont-email.me> <1e5cb0d4-f447-4fa7-b1e9-8056b03d27a2@att.net> <vohp3q$28sjf$1@dont-email.me> <b9b0c514-a71c-4cd8-b291-a4847db04795@att.net> <vokmsi$2t0ls$1@dont-email.me> <8a4c44c4ba0d3260a90d463acfa814fbc83f557a@i2pn2.org> <voktdg$2tt35$1@dont-email.me> <853f9685ed5be27fedb6486ca2931ef189b920df@i2pn2.org> <vonjm5$3ghe5$1@dont-email.me> <5aefc0d0b454a230e721a8cdb8400cb25ea9a8c1@i2pn2.org> <vonqus$3hu2d$1@dont-email.me> <f220383b9803059a387c34e198906c7729101311@i2pn2.org> <vopv2h$s46$2@dont-email.me> <340761ab1ceb68741d949331a0c64a3d6d5fa237@i2pn2.org> <vosf9f$hjfh$4@dont-email.me> <f85884a59c9301bfc9d6a66fa935b74dc080ff24@i2pn2.org> <vot40r$lfa0$2@dont-email.me> <865ffa4c4c1091981c5b3b93ddf3dba690cd5ad2@i2pn2.org> <vp02g2$188u2$7@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 03:02:20 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="559652"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <vp02g2$188u2$7@dont-email.me> On 2/17/25 2:25 PM, WM wrote: > On 16.02.2025 19:39, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/16/25 11:33 AM, WM wrote: >>> On 16.02.2025 13:11, joes wrote: >>>> Am Sun, 16 Feb 2025 11:39:45 +0100 schrieb WM: >>> >>>>> Therefore all can be removed, and U(F) = ℕ ==> U(F\F) = ℕ. >>>> No, obviously you can’t remove all >>> >>> Proofs by induction cover all elements of the set. My proof proves >>> that no FISON is capable of changing the premise UF = ℕ. > >> There is no requirement for a "necessary" elememt for the set. > > A set without elements is an empty set and not capable of producing ℕ. > > Regards, WM > But an empty set of REQUIRED elements doesn't mean we can't have a set of sufficient elements. There is no requirment for a set of required digits, if we have options, which we do. We can use all sorts of infinite sets to build the set of Natural Numbers. In fact, we have so many options we can't count them.