Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<55cbb075e2f793e3c52f55af73c82c61d2ce8d44@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 09:35:29 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <55cbb075e2f793e3c52f55af73c82c61d2ce8d44@i2pn2.org> References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vdk7rr$3c2vh$1@dont-email.me> <vdmna5$3qtii$1@dont-email.me> <f64271a8cb19d2f7e53f21c81179ec69a69da034@i2pn2.org> <vdo8ke$586f$3@dont-email.me> <vdodmu$5sti$4@dont-email.me> <vdoeft$6biq$1@dont-email.me> <vdof0j$5suf$3@dont-email.me> <vdogjq$6l4c$1@dont-email.me> <vdpbuv$alvo$1@dont-email.me> <8c94a117d7ddaba3e7858116dc5bc7c66a46c405@i2pn2.org> <vdqttc$mnhd$1@dont-email.me> <vdr1g3$n3li$6@dont-email.me> <8ce3fac3a0c92d85c72fec966d424548baebe5af@i2pn2.org> <vdrd5q$sn2$2@news.muc.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 13:35:29 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="681588"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vdrd5q$sn2$2@news.muc.de> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2034 Lines: 19 On 10/5/24 8:58 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote: > > [ .... ] > >> But actual infinity doesn't exist. > > What does it mean for a mathematical concept not to exist? That it doesn't create a usable (non-contradictory) logical system. > > You seem to be falling into the same trap as John Gabriel used to when he > was still posting here. He asserted things like "irrational numbers > don't exist" and "negative numbers don't exist". He was never able to > state exactly what he meant by this non-existence. > > [ .... ] >