Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Muon paradox
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 17:49:44 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <570d3cf2cdfe6fe3e3ba17299d83c149@www.novabbs.com>
References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com> <69a411f78f0258b39bc5cfad5d0a82a2@www.novabbs.com> <5eeed9d7dcd249453d28b665513d9ede@www.novabbs.com> <dfZOTD7gWFQtbW5-AX25hmrFeIQ@jntp> <9a1dcd3d3964df057d6a82d9ee20b996@www.novabbs.com> <1832194fdccf2038$1447517$1481196$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2704977"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$VPPipRWLqwP8y4Y1z5u2Nupt4PGfti3FQlbbdGi30vyYsycIVxjh.
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
Bytes: 3180
Lines: 48

On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 5:03:57 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

> W dniu 01.04.2025 o 06:01, LaurenceClarkCrossen pisze:
>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 1:02:00 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>>
>>> Le 31/03/2025 à 23:54, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit
>>> :
>>>> Relativity can be so easy to refute only because it has not been subject
>>>> to open critical review. It is facile nonsense.
>>>
>>> It's true.
>>>
>>> Scientific structures, like political structures, are strange and
>>> opaque.
>>>
>>> If someone tries to offer an interesting approach, or prove through
>>> calculations and reflection that there are biases and paradoxes, or even
>>> contradictions, they are blacklisted for decades.
>>>
>>> I think we'll have to wait until artificial intelligence is truly
>>> intelligent, and above all memorizing, for it to be able to say things
>>> for
>>> itself: "I detected in a participant a theory that far surpasses in
>>> quality, elegance, and experimental approach anything that has been said
>>> so far."
>>>
>>> For the moment, this hasn't happened because there is a huge human bias
>>> that consists of saying: "It is impossible for there to exist a human on
>>> earth capable of producing a theory superior to the one proposed by Mr.
>>> Einstein."
>>>
>>> Even if sometimes the denials turn into absurdity, even human madness.
>>>
>>> R.H.
>> How can the muons prove time dilation when high speed is the cause and
>> they move the same speed as in the laboratory?
>
>  From the point of view of muons...
> If the muons have mouths - they would scream
> that our Giant Guru was right and sing
> a hymn to his incredible wisdom!!!
> They would, for sure!!
> And muons can never be mistaken. Have
> you ever heard of a mistaken muon?
>
> That's the proof.
The difficulty we are confronted with is due to the fact that Einstein
did not realize that Newton's particle theory had been disproven and the
wave theory had been proven.