Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Why relativity is a =?UTF-8?B?cHNldWRvc2NpZW5jZT8gRmlyc3QgYXBwcm9h?=
 =?UTF-8?B?Y2gu?=
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:35:49 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <572db43d3ebd42800ac6941266f53931@www.novabbs.com>
References: <d8b52c0ad27618036611e0704e58e607@www.novabbs.com> <vbp5j0$2taov$1@dont-email.me> <dad1eb8634e36c05d20669465aa5a1b2@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1603782"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="hWiuCAeR3KEZYJfTvV11n0qrRi6oqW/zjvEZQQGun9A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: f685b96694175b2ad43ead343ead0a9c0082fe88
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$zYr.W2KnLC3NDXLqdd8PieDeZH.XUmpzlK9BsFEzJZAvhRGP6iOnG
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3312
Lines: 52

More additions to my OP about the pseudoscience that relativity is.

Remember MASS INCREASE due to inertial velocity v>0?

This one is also INDIGNANT and SHAMEFUL.

In the 1905 paper (§ 10. Dynamics of the Slowly Accelerated Electron),
Einstein violated any concept of relativity when he MERGED BOTH
REFERENCE FRAMES INTO ONE, to obtain his incredible assertion that mass
of one electron increased with velocity v.

This DIABOLIC LIE was supported increasingly over the next 90 YEARS,
till mid 1990s, when the relativistic community started to ABANDON THIS
IDEA (90 years of idiocy and counting). Thanks to the relentless work of
prestigious relativists (like the Russian Okun), MOST OF THE COMMUNITY
switched to the concept of increase of kinetic energy, accepting that
MASS is INVARIABLE.

So, instead of thinking AND USING for 90 years the concept of mass
increase under inertial motion:

M = Mo/√(1 - v²/c²)

relativists switched (the majority of them, EVEN TODAY) to this
expression of KE increase:


KE = (1/√(1 - v²/c²) - 1) Mo, which doesn't include THE FAKE VALUE Mo of
any mass at (relative) rest.

This was done, and still is done, WHILE THERE IS NOT A SINGLE IDEA ABOUT
WHAT MASS IS. Even less in 1905,
when Einstein plagiarized Poincaré by using TWO MASSES FOR AN ELECTRON:
Longitudinal and transversal masses.

I don't know what moral stature and lack of intellectual integrity had
MANY GENERATIONS OF PHYSICISTS to support this STUPID IDEA FOR ALMOST A
CENTURY.

DEGENERACY OF THOUGHT AND GENERALIZED INTELLECTUAL CORRUPTION OF THOSE
WHO WANTED TO KEEP BELONGING TO THE RELATIVISTIC HERD (ANYTHING FOR A
JOB, MONEY AND PRIVILEGES), BUT THESE CONFLICTS LED DIRECTLY TO THE
DEATH OF PHYSICS AS AN HONORABLE SCIENCE.

Today, physics (almost on the entire of branches using relativity) is
rejected by the technological world, which is replacing it as a science
of value. Relativity has found shelter on two or three USELESS BRANCHES,
like particle physics, cosmology and astrophysics, which DON'T PROVIDE A
SINGLE THING OF VALUE TO THE SOCIETY AND REAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
SINCE MID 1960s.

Shame on PSEUDOSCIENTISTS. They don't have a single ounce of moral and
integrity.