Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<57550167021cee2a023eccbf12aeacd8@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet.
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:36:46 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <57550167021cee2a023eccbf12aeacd8@www.novabbs.com>
References: <00939c17919600807e3ad6527b47e74d@www.novabbs.com> <8e4d47b49b0d08a32c4d241a7bd9f85c@www.novabbs.com> <CnzdqQplC3yAzWb9SEFF1Xb9-o4@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="359408"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$wg9btnQ8O./D9NjL62V1vuZebZ/1vC/dvfFsYZpCIsg1DniT8RRBe
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
Bytes: 2037
Lines: 20

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:37:36 +0000, Python wrote:

> Le 20/01/2025 à 22:30, tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) a
> écrit :
>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 17:26:08 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>
>>> This is necessary because it claims to have proven the doubling of the
>>> Newtonian deflection, which involves curved space and parallel lines
>>> meeting.
>>
>> You really don't understand any of this.
>
> "LaurenceClarkCrossen" is not sincere, she/he is a troll who has decided
> to have fun by posting nonsense to annoy people. She/he even admitted it
> when she/he started to post here mentioning "Androcles" not that long
> ago.
It is well known that ideologues defend their ideology by projecting
their own faults, as in politics. You couldn't give your source since I
didn't mention that name and don't know what it refers to. However,
relativity does fall under the classification of a folk tale. Why can't
you answer the criticism?