Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<57dabca0fc2bc862b7245f1377f81f5edb1d4f97@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: "all you work is just a bit fat LIE"
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 21:44:14 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <57dabca0fc2bc862b7245f1377f81f5edb1d4f97@i2pn2.org>
References: <aDB0Q.1562741$4AM6.1458331@fx17.ams4>
 <101v3h3$2c1iv$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 02:27:45 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3619576"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <101v3h3$2c1iv$1@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

On 6/6/25 12:03 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 6/6/2025 7:59 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> "all you work is just a bit fat LIE" -- Richard Damon.
>>
>> Richard Damon is a child.
>>
>> /Flibble
> 
> Yes he is.
> If he had correct reasoning he would not need mere rhetoric.
> 

But it isn't just "rhetoric", as every accusation of lying, is preceeded 
by pointing out the factual basis for the claim.

You have so much as admitted that you whole work is just a lie, as you 
admit the your Decider and Input are not "orogrms" per the term-of-art, 
and yet, you also say they correspond to the proof, where the first 
requirement on them is that the ARE programs.

Thus, your whole work *IS* based on a lie, the lie that you system is in 
conformance to the proof you are claiming to refute.

Of course, your really problem is that you don't really know the meaning 
of the words as terms-of-art, and don't care to learn, and you think you 
have the "right" to change the meaning, which is just one form of 
INTENTIONAL deception (to use a word knowing you aren't using it in the 
meaning implied by the field) and in fact state that at any point you 
"reserve" the right to use whate-ever "common" meaning of a word you 
want, which is just an admissition that anything you say could be a lie.