Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Space and spacetime
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 01:50:38 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <57daee8da23d6ae5103795e3c9012685@www.novabbs.com>
References: <v4k05l$3agjr$3@paganini.bofh.team> <972e62f21cba1316f2184b61c6a0c401@www.novabbs.com> <17da9b4080dd35af$266525$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <a4eb8b42ce7499e5ec60bde25e4e865a@www.novabbs.com> <17dab8b50a072746$163214$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <ccf5155edb060554bdacb76d43c78f36@www.novabbs.com> <17dabca9290af769$189571$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <93708b1befdea8fb7c18da1b3d12630d@www.novabbs.com> <17dac4a0a98761ea$266527$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9ae2e2bf5f37a77b3e1bd160981c6fd5@www.novabbs.com> <17db1164fde32607$208349$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <392fcd2a13fa911f8f6d5182fb485f7b@www.novabbs.com> <17db1a8a53f81f54$288216$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <766d95371391c171627beb10f0e1ae9c@www.novabbs.com> <17db25828bda4e92$4$479221$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="762590"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$avfhLX/kquYmWSHc7ZMXleJn9daxHSh2YLU8Fg6WDYWg/F.ji7dB2
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
Bytes: 5829
Lines: 120

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 21.06.2024 o 23:46, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > W dniu 21.06.2024 o 20:21, gharnagel pisze:
> > > >
> > > > An autistic "information engineer" who can't understand
> > > > metaphor gets really asinine when his fuzzy-thinking is
> > > 
> > > A fanatic piece of lying ship, caught on an
> > > impudent, obvious  lie is screaming about a
> > > "metaphor".
> > 
> > So Mad Maciej doesn't understand metaphor.  
>
> Why won't you explain, you lying shit.
> And why won't you stop dodging and
> demonstrate the power of predictions
> of your moronic Shit on my example.

I'm not dodging.  I'm merely asking consequential question which
Woozie-liar refuses to answer.

> > > Why won't you stop dodging and answer - what is the predicttion
> > > of the observer in my example according to the physics of your
> > > idiot guru?
> > 
> > First the autistic information engineer must define his terms.
>
> Must he?

It is incumbant on him since he is the one demanding an answer to his
devious and misleading problem.

> But what does the relativistic piece of
> shit mean by "define"? By "must"? By
> "terms"?

I just want everything clearly and honestly laid out.  Of course,
that's too much to ask from a dishonest hypocrite.

> > > Let's get to the point, sure. Is the RELATIVISTIC formula of
> velocity
> > > adding  a part of Lorentz's ETHER theory?
> > > Yes or no, trash.
> > 
> > First of all, no human being is trash, so Weird Wozzy doesn't really
> > want an honest answer, which I already gave to him anyway:
> > 
> > "[Heinlein] also said that deriving something was just finding out
> > what you already knew.  Meaning, of course, that it was all there
> > in the original equations, implied, which is the case with
> relativistic
> > velocity addition.
>
> So, according to you and your idiot gurus -
> in LET every observer, stationary in ether or not -
> would observe light moving at speed c. Right?

What's the matter, mathematically-incompetent Wozzie, can't actually
USE
the theory and calculate the answer for yourself?

> > As anyone would know if he weren't mathematically
> > incompetent."
> > 
> > Because of Wozzie's mathematical incompetence, he can't figure out
> that
> > (1) relativistic velocity addition is DERIVED from the Lorentz
> > transform equations.

> It is, sure, after assuming the obviously correct
> Holiest Postulate.

The postulates were determined FIRST, dishonest Wozzie-fool, and THEN
the
LT equations were derived.

> And speaking of mathematics - it's always
> good to remind that your bunch of idiots
> had to announce its oldest part false, as
> it didn't want to fit the madness of your
> insane guru.

Irrelevant and false baloney seeking to deflect from the drubbing
Wozzie's
but is getting in these "discussions."

> > (2) "Lorentz's ETHER theory" has NOTHING to do with it because there
> is
> > no ether*.  So LET is a dead end.  Dishonest Wozzie's attempt to
> insert
> > that into his question was a red herring, a misleading fallacy.
> > (3) The RVA equation is derived from the LT equations by dividing the
> > equation for dx' by the equation for dt', so there is no "adding" to
> > either LET or SR.
> > 
> > *Ether theory is a dead end because SR took away the last vestige of
> > any physicality: that of motion.  IOW, it becomes fundamentally
> > undetectable, which makes it nonexistent for all practical purposes.
>
> And how about 0 meridian? Is it fundamentally
> detectable?

More attempted deflection.  The eath has nothing to do with either LET
or SR.

> If it is not - it must be nonexistent for all practical purposes.
> Am I correct,  Harrie, poor halfbrain?

It is part of a coordinate system.  Coordinate systems aren't part of
nature.
They are human mental constructs.

But this is another stupid attempt to deflect from Wozzie-filth having
to face
the drubbing he's getting.  His parents didn't do their job of raising
an
honest and responsible human, so he has to take his whuppin' now.